Florida Restaurant Wins $3.2M In Eminent Domain Dispute

A Florida state judge awarded $3.2 million as compensation to a Palm Beach County restaurant that was sued by the state’s Department of Transportation under the state’s eminent domain laws so that the government could obtain land to rebuild the Earman River Bridge after it partially collapsed in 2017.

In his order filed Tuesday, Judge Jaimie R. Goodman of the 15th Judicial Circuit Court noted that the department had previously deposited $346,100 in the court registry, and told the department to send a $2.8 million check to Frigate’s Waterfront Bar & Grill Inc.’s counsel within 60 days of receiving his court order.

Florida’s government began its suit against Frigate’s Waterfront Bar & Grill in September 2021 in Florida state court. According to a public relations representative for Government Law Group PLLC, the law firm representing the restaurant, the department initially offered $346,000 for the restaurant’s land, which was near the reconstruction site of the partially collapsed bridge.

The representative said the reconstruction project would have disrupted the restaurant’s business for seven years.

After the suit was filed, the department and the restaurant began to mediate in December 2022 and settled the dispute in January 2023, according to court records.

In a Wednesday statement to Law360, the restaurant’s counsel, Richard J. Dewitt III described the compensation award as a “stellar result.” Dewitt said that he had to use eminent domain experts to determine how much compensation the restaurant deserved for its land.

Dewitt also praised the professionalism of one of the department’s counsel, Melissa Presser.

“Ms. Presser had an extremely difficult job balancing the needs of FDOT to take the property, the impact to the property and business owner, and protecting the taxpayers dollars in fully compensating the property and business owner,” Dewitt said. “The ultimate result was a great win for Frigate’s which will provide relief to the impacts caused by the Earman Bridge replacement project.”

Counsel for the department didn’t respond to a request for comment Wednesday.

The Department of Transportation is represented by David R. Ottey, Jared Silver and Melissa Presser.

Frigate’s Waterfront Bar & Grill is represented by Richard J. Dewitt III of Government Law Group PLLC.

The case is State of Florida Department of Transportation v. Frigate’s Holdings LLC, case number 50-2021-CA-010519-XXXX-MB, in the Circuit Court of the 15th Judicial Circuit in and for Palm Beach County, Florida.

–Editing by Marygrace Anderson.

Update: This story has been updated with comment from counsel for Frigate’s.

Article Link: Florida Restaurant Wins $3.2M In Eminent Domain Dispute
Auther: Isaac Monterose

New bill would make it riskier to sue to protect undeveloped lands

Floridians would be on the hook to pay when they lose lawsuits that oppose building new homes on undeveloped lands, under a newly filed bill.

Environmental groups fear that if the bill were to pass, it would deter people from filing lawsuits limiting development — and lead to greater sprawl.

“The intent of the legislation seems to be to chill people from filing these sorts of challenges,” said Gil Smart, Policy Director for the Friends of the Everglades. “These are often situations that are controversial — development is such a huge issue statewide.”

State Rep. Wyman Duggan, R-Jacksonville, recently filed the bill, which puts people on the hook financially if they lose such legal challenges to local government’s growth plans, or amendments to those plans.

Through the years, many communities across Florida have enacted protections to preserve undeveloped land and agriculture.

For example, some Florida counties, including Palm Beach County, have comprehensive plans that include agricultural reserves. If local governments were to amend their plans at the behest of a developer to allow a new big-box store or housing, and a person sues over that amendment and loses, that person must pay the county’s legal bills.

Conversely, if the resident is successful in court, the local government is responsible for the plaintiff’s legal costs.

Rep. Duggan’s office did not reply to requests for comment.

Keith Poliakoff, a land-use expert with the Government Law Group of Fort Lauderdale, represents both municipalities and those who challenge them. “Municipalities win 99% of these types of cases,” he said, “because Florida judges typically take the position that a municipality should be able to run itself and have the right to make decisions about their land-use future.”

In other words, people challenging a development would likely have to pay legal fees, he said.

“What this statutory scheme does is it prevents an aggrieved party from having their argument heard, because they’ll be fearful that they’ll be paying the municipalities’ legal fees. So this regulation is probably created by the development community to thwart appeals of land-use changes.”

Appeals delay developments until the land-use challenge is finally heard by a court, which Poliakoff says could take a year or even two after the filing. “A developer would love this bill because they would hope it would prevent someone from appealing.”

“I believe this will have a chilling effect on individuals being able to challenge perceived wrongs that they would like a secondary party to review. It will thwart challenges where a municipality may be overzealous in an action it’s taking. It basically gives a municipality the green light to make changes to its comp plan without fear that they’ll be challenged.”

“I have two or three orders going on right now that if this [legislation] was passed, it would have made my clients think twice about challenging a municipality’s actions.”

The newly filed bill comes as housing is in sharp demand. Broward, Palm Beach and Miami-Dade counties are all facing housing shortages, and all have different lingo for the open land within their comprehensive plans, their guides for growth and land preservation.

Visitors walk along the Marsh Trail at the Arthur R. Marshall Loxahatchee National Wildlife Refuge. The trail abuts Palm Beach County’s Agricultural Reserve, a nearly 21,000-acre area that the county says is meant to preserve unique farmland and wetlands. (Susan Stocker / South Florida Sun Sentinel)

In 1999, Palm Beach County voters created a nearly 21,000-acre Agricultural Reserve between the turnpike and the Loxahatchee National Wildlife Refuge.

The county’s website says that the purpose of the reserve is to “preserve unique farmland and wetlands” to enhance agriculture, environmental and water resources, and open space, by limiting the use to agriculture, conservation and low-density residential development.

Some developments within the reserve have involved land swaps. One such development proposal by GL Homes looks to expand from an approved 277 homes to 704 homes — the Palm Beach County commission will revisit the issue in May.

In order to build the homes, the county would need to approve a land swap in which GL Homes trades 1,600 acres in Loxahatchee to the county for the rights to build in the Agricultural Reserve.

Broward County does not have an agricultural reserve, but does have a thin band of agricultural land in the southwest corner.

Palm Beach County’s Agricultural Reserve, in red, was established in 1999, and maintains open space and farmland adjacent to wilderness and Everglades water treatment areas. A proposed bill would make it more financially risky for citizens to sue to stop development in lands such as the Agricultural Reserve. (Palm Beach County/SFWMD)

Miami-Dade County recently experienced controversy over an industrial complex slated to go up on farmland beyond the county’s Urban Development Boundary.

The County Commission approved the project, despite the fact that the land had been targeted for Everglades restoration. Last Thursday, the Miami Herald reported that Florida’s Department of Economic Opportunity notified the county that it had fouled up the approval process, and that a re-vote — with a new commission — might be needed.

“There’s a lot of pressure on communities in Florida, and comprehensive plans are out there to help guide growth,” Smart said. “But when you change the plans at the behest of developers, people are going to have a problem with that. Our view is that they should be able to engage in the process without retribution.”

Environmental groups see the new bill as an extension of a 2019 bill, which established that if people sue to stop a development order and lose, they must pay the prevailing party’s court costs.

“Our concern is that this sort of thing is going to enable more sprawl, and more haphazard development, which is going to impact water and the environment in general,” Smart said. “In places like Miami-Dade County … it could have an impact on the footprint of Everglades restoration.”

The bill would have to go through three committees before going to a vote during the March legislative session, Smart said. A companion Senate bill has not yet been filed.

Article Link: New bill would make it riskier to sue to protect undeveloped lands
Auther: Bill Kearney

Government Law Group Adds Attorney Julieta Gomez De Mello To Litigation Team

Julieta Gomez De Mello

Government Law Group is excited to announce that attorney Julieta Gomez de Mello has joined the firm as Senior Associate. She will concentrate her practice on complex commercial litigation representing businesses and individuals in a variety of litigation matters, business litigation, appellate practice, Intellectual Property and Probate Litigation. The addition of Ms. Gomez de Mello expands Government Law Group’s growing commercial litigation practice.

Ms. Gomez De Mello’s experience includes litigating cases involving General Litigation, Employment Law, Professional Liability, Premises Liability, Immigration, Intellectual Property and Personal Injury. Prior to joining Government Law Group, she worked at prominent law firms in New Jersey and Florida successfully litigating complex commercial litigation and high-exposure cases for large corporate clients. In addition to working in the private sector, Ms. Gomez De Mello worked as a Staff Attorney for South Jersey Legal Services, Inc., a non-profit organization based in New Jersey in their Migrant Farmworker Unit handling wage and labor disputes. She also clerked for the Honorable Rodney Cunningham in the New Jersey Superior Court, Atlantic County.

“Julieta is detail-oriented and commits herself to the highest standard of professionalism on behalf of her clients,” said Keith Poliakoff, Co-Founder of Government Law Group. “Julieta will play an important role as we continue to strategically grow and expand our litigation services that we provide to our clients. Julieta is a great asset for the Government Law Group.”

Founded by veteran attorneys Keith Poliakoff and Neil Schiller, Government Law Group offers its clients unparalleled comprehensive service in land use, lobbying, government contracts, commercial litigation, corporate counseling and municipal representation. The firm has offices in Ft. Lauderdale and West Palm Beach and provides clients with highly personalized services to determine the best legal strategy to accomplish their goals. Since the firm was founded in 2021, the Government Law Group has greatly expanded its commercial litigation services.

A Cuban native raised in Miami, Ms. Gomez de Mello is a member of the Florida Bar and New Jersey Bar. She earned her J.D. from Rutgers University School of Law, where she competed in a national Moot Court competition, served as the Vice President of the Rutgers Intellectual Property Law Clinic and was the recipient of several prestigious scholarships, including the Chief Judge Helen W. Nies Intellectual Property Law Scholarship. She completed her undergraduate studies at Florida International University, where she graduated with a bachelor’s degree in English Literature, a minor in music and a Certificate in Translation Studies.

“I was drawn to Government Law Group because the attorneys are highly respected by their peers, are involved in the community and, in several instances, their creative litigation strategies have reshaped the legal landscape,” said Ms. Gomez de Mello. “I look forward to bringing my skills and experience to a seasoned team of litigators to further diversify the services GLG has to offer.”

Article Link: https://www.citybiz.co/article/372343/government-law-group-adds-attorney-julieta-gomez-de-mello-to-litigation-team/

Hollywood Development Boom: Shrinking Land Supply Presents Opportunities

Hollywood, the beach town sandwiched between Fort Lauderdale and Miami, is finally experiencing a real estate boom. Fueled by high demand for land in the region, and a limited supply, the once-quiet town is now booming with development for the first time in decades.

Downtown Hollywood and the iconic Young Circle area are revitalizing with more $1.5 billion in real estate development planned or under construction. One of the driving forces behind Hollywood’s transformation is BTI Partners, a Fort Lauderdale-based investment and development firm. Noah Breakstone, CEO of BTI Partners, says that since new developments are becoming landlocked, there will be more opportunities to identify and revitalize neighborhoods.

“Traditionally a lot of the development moved west, and it was stopped by the Everglades, and now people are looking at how we come back east,” said Breakstone. “What’s interesting about Hollywood is that it’s easy to get to Miami, it’s easy to get to Fort Lauderdale, so it’s easy to access those markets.

“What’s unique about Young Circle is a 10-acre park right in the middle of that roundabout so you have an outdoor amphitheater that can seat 5,000 to 7,000 people, beautiful open green space, a glassblowing museum, and it’s a really unique setup to have that circle. Also what I love about it is that it’s a hop, skip, and a jump away from the ocean,” he said.

BTI Partners has two development projects underway in Hollywood’s Young Circle neighborhood. One of the development sites sits on the long-neglected Hollywood Bread Building, which has been abandoned for decades. BTI Partners plans to add 362 market-rate apartments and 16,000 square feet of retail space. It is expected to be completed in 2024.

The second project includes two towers on the east side of Young Circle with planned residential living, shops, restaurants, office space, and a skywalk connecting them.

Breakstone says people really value living in a walkable neighborhood.

“I think all those natural attributes will only continue to drive and revitalize that neighborhood. We’re really trying to find ways to get out of our car. We learned that through COVID-19,” he said. “Before COVID, we learned that it may take an hour to an hour and a half to get to work or get home, but why not be with my family and friends and enjoy my neighborhood? I think these types of communities as they’re reimagined provide that type of a living where you really get a more pedestrian type of community.”

According to land use attorney Keith Poliakoff of Government Law Group, developers are eager to revitalize Hollywood and secure development sites that are no longer available in other coastal communities in South Florida.

“Hollywood was almost passed over in the 1990s during the construction boom. Hallandale had the surge in development, and then it jumped over Hollywood to Fort Lauderdale,” said Poliakoff. “As a result, developers really in the last five years have been capitalizing on the demand of people wanting to live there, and the projects are getting approved and finally getting out of the ground—that has been the vision of Hollywood for years.”

Poliakoff says it’s exciting to see how the town has become the next frontier of development.

“Last Wednesday, the Hollywood City commission debated for probably 10 hours, the future of Orangebrook golf course, and one of the proposals is from Rees Jones, one of the world’s most notable golf course designers who has proposed to put in a PGA-quality golf course minutes away from downtown Hollywood, and a four-star luxury hotel,” Poliakoff said. “When you look at that and see that five years [ago], there would not be a PGA Tour that would desire to come to the region, particularly Hollywood.”

Hollywood’s beaches are also undergoing redevelopment efforts, and local government is also putting a focus on affordable housing options.

“Broward County is also very aware of the jobs and the residences being built in the city, and Broward County Transit under Tim Garling has been very active in creating new transit bus stops in Hollywood and is diligently working with the city to create a new public stop downtown to ensure that all of the people that will be living there in the next 10 years will have full access to public transportation,” said Poliakoff.

Downtown Hollywood businesses have struggled during the off-season when snowbirds return home, but with an influx of new residents moving to the area, business is expected to improve.

According to Breakstone, “You’re going to see all of these neighborhoods with more restaurants, more entertainment—instead of driving further, it’s built out with housing anyway, so you’ll have everything there that’s bikeable, walkable, and pedestrian-friendly, which is what I think everyone is looking for today.”

Poliakoff says Hollywood’s demographics include people who are relocating from other cities in Broward County, as well as newcomers to Florida. The rental market consists of millennials and young families who typically have one car, like to live in close proximity to where they work, and want to be in a walkable area.

“Most of the new developments, especially in the downtown area, are geared toward that younger generation who’s looking to live in that downtown setting,” said Poliakoff. “There are developments [that] are 98%-100% rented, that have just come out of the ground, which is almost unheard of. There’s normally a time frame that it takes to rent up an entire establishment and these are hitting near capacity in record time.”

According to Poliakoff, the city is hoping to expand its higher-end retail and restaurant options in the near future.

“I’ve been fortunate to represent some incredible developers in this region, and what’s great is, that it’s one thing to get a project approved, it’s another thing to see that development get off the ground, and giving the city what they had hoped for,” Poliakoff said.

Article Link: Hollywood Development Boom: Shrinking Land Supply Presents Opportunities
Auther: Melea VanOstrand

BTI’s $500M South Fla. Mixed-Use Project Gets Approvals

A mixed-use development featuring two 35-story towers and 856 units developed by BTI Partners, with guidance from Government Law Group PLLC, has won key approvals from Hollywood, Florida, officials this week, clearing a path for the over $500 million project to move forward.

The Hollywood City Commission voted unanimously on Wednesday to approve the rezoning, design and site plan for Block 57, a project planned for downtown Hollywood that involves extending a major boulevard to go between the site’s two proposed towers.

“It alone will tremendously enhance property values, clean up homelessness, bring eyes to the streets, walkability to the area and really make downtown Hollywood … what it was always intended to be,” Keith Poliakoff of Government Law Group told Law360 in an interview.

Poliakoff said the approvals for Block 57, a project that will cost a little over $500 million to build, came after working with various government entities on the plan for two years.

The proposed development has faced “virtually no resident concerns at all, which is almost unheard of,” he added.

The project, developed by Fort Lauderdale, Florida-based BTI, features 856 apartment units, over 38,000 square feet of office space, 142,000 square feet of commercial retail space and 1,500 parking spots, according to site plan documents.

It is expected to encompass over three acres about a mile and a half from the South Florida city’s boardwalk, according to BTI’s website. Hollywood is a beachside town situated between Fort Lauderdale and Miami in Broward County.

The approvals for Block 57 came with some conditions to make sure that the design the Hollywood city commissioners OK’d is maintained as the project moves further along the construction process, Poliakaff said.

At Wednesday’s meeting, the commissioners also asked BTI to continue working with city staff and the Florida Department of Transportation on the project’s street design and traffic flow.

The development firm previously paid $15.75 million to buy part of the project site, a retail complex called Young Circle Shopping Center, according to an announcement in 2020.

BTI and Bridge Investment Group recently secured an $83 million construction loan to build another mixed-use project in Hollywood that will feature 362 units and 16,000 square feet of retail space, the companies said in August.

BTI is represented by Keith Poliakoff of Government Law Group PLLC.

–Editing by Steven Edesltone.

Article Link: BTI’s $500M South Fla. Mixed-Use Project Gets Approvals
Auther: Charlie Innis

Bonds on the Ballot in Delray, and a New Doc’s All American

Two major bond referendums will be on the Delray Beach ballot in March.

One will ask voters to approve $100 million for public safety improvements, including a new police station. The other will be a $20 million plan to upgrade recreation, focusing on Atlantic Dunes and Catherine Strong parks.

The city commission approved the proposals Monday. That alone would have been noteworthy. Just as remarkable, though, was the unanimous approval. For all of the city’s factional politics, the commission was united on what would be the most significant public investment since voters approved the Decade of Excellence bonds in 1990.

That $21 million program—later expanded through refinancing—was key to Delray Beach’s revival. This commission sees these proposals as essential to sustaining the redevelopment of the last three decades.

City officials said the police station, which dates back to 1992, had become outdated after just four years. The money would finance a rebuild of the fire station that handles calls on the east side of the city and in Gulf Stream. Delray Beach needs to adjust its system with the end of the contract to provide service to Highland Beach and the loss of that station. The town is creating its own department.

The timing is right for the new proposals. Delray Beach’s existing general obligation bond programs—financed with property taxes—expire in 2023 and 2024. The city also is issuing a bond to pay for the new water plant and system. Customers’ bills will finance that work.

Commissioners now must decide whether Delray Beach should issue the bonds over 20 years or 30 years. Owners of homes assessed at $250,000 would pay $132 a year for 20 years or $107 for 30 years under the police/fire proposal. They would pay $27 and $22 under the parks proposal. Those numbers would double for homesteads assessed at $500,000

Ryan Boylston had pushed for the referendums more than any other commissioner. He agreed that he and his colleagues “were on the same page.” Boylston noted that he and Mayor Shelly Petrolia, who often are at odds, “put aside” an issue regarding Atlantic Dunes Park that could have jeopardized chances of the parks bond passing.

Oddly, given the amount of money, the public safety bond would not provide Delray Beach with a new emergency operations center. During Hurricane Irma in 2017, the current center leaked and there were computer problems. Boylston said the city has not decided on a location.

But will the proposals pass, given higher inflation and talk of a recession? Said Boylston, “We’ve never voted one down.” The 1990 plan passed as South Florida went into a recession.

No plans for a new Delray city hall

One project not on the list is a new city hall. Delray Beach’s main government building was built in 1961.

Despite a 1997 renovation and storm hardening, the building looks beyond dated. Some commissioners had talked about making a new city hall part of a bond proposal. Not now.

But the idea isn’t dead. Boylston notes that if the bond referendums pass, that will take care of Delray Beach’s public safety and parks needs for the next two or three decades. The community redevelopment agency is paying for the new Pompey Park, meaning that the money isn’t coming out of the city’s operating budget. A public-private partnership could finance a makeover of the municipal golf course, which is another big-ticket item.

Boylston said the commission wants to “get through the election” and the bond votes, then reassess city hall. “We may be able to take care of that from city funds.” Though Delray Beach will examine whether a public-private partnership could work with that facility, “We may not need it.”

A new Doc’s All American

Renderings for the new Doc’s All American

Barring something unexpected, a new Doc’s All American will be coming to Delray Beach.

This week, the city commission approved a project that will combine the iconic downtown fast-food restaurant that faces Swinton Avenue with a 17,000-square-foot office and retail building on the adjoining property that faces West Atlantic Avenue. The vote was unanimous.

Doc’s closed last year when the owner of the two properties was unable to secure approval of a larger project. The new version reduces the height from four stories to three, is less dense and offers porches facing Atlantic, to make what Neil Schiller, the developer’s attorney, called “a very pedestrian-friendly environment.” Opponents had argued that the earlier version would have overwhelmed the site.

Because of the changes, Schiller said, the developer needed to ask for much less from the city. The commission did need to allow outdoor dining as part of the approval. Schiller said the two potential operators “want Doc’s as Doc’s,” not as a typical indoor restaurant.

The site plan must go before the historic preservation board, and Doc’s must get its historic designation. No one I spoke with, though, expects a late snag.

“We overcame a lot of challenges,” Schiller said. He pointed out that the project will be across the street from the new Sundy Village. “Between the two, I think we’ll have created something special for the gateway to Delray Beach.”

Delray to consider DDA reopening Old School Square

Cornell Art Museum in Old School Square; photo courtesy of the Delray Beach DDA

On Friday, city commissioners will hold a special meeting to discuss placing the Downtown Development Authority in charge of reopening Delray Beach’s Old School Square.

I reported last week that the DDA board had expressed interest in reopening the Cornell Museum, which is part of Old School Square. The meeting presentation goes further. It includes a staff recommendation that the DDA develop a plan for reopening the entire arts complex.

The plan is sweeping, to the point of possibly renaming Old School Square as part of a “rebranding.” The first phase would be to form a task force of “industry experts and DDA stakeholders.” I’ll have more after the meeting.

Speaker at Delray commission meeting charged with perjury

It’s one of the oddest stories in Delray Beach’s history.

On Aug. 9, the city commission was discussing Delray Central, the mixed-use project proposed for South Congress Avenue. A speaker identified himself as the president of a nearby homeowners association—at the Andover single-family home community— and testified that “we” support Delray Central. Nothing new there. HOAs speak for or against development projects all the time.

Neil Carson; image from Palm Beach County Sheriff’s Office

Except that Neil Carson is not president of the Andover HOA. He’s not on the board. He just lives in the community.

Which wouldn’t be much of a problem except that the hearing on Delray Central was quasi-judicial. Which means that all speakers must swear to tell the truth.

Carson now finds himself charged with felony perjury. He told investigators that he was “nervous” to address the commission for the first time.

“Nervous?” Carson is managing director of multi-family development for Kaufman Lynn Construction, which is based in Delray Beach. The housing proposed for Delray Central is multi-family.

The law firm that represents Andover’s HOA noted Carson’s lie. According to the probable cause affidavit, Carson plans to write letters of apology to the city and the HOA. The city would have to decide whether to prosecute.

El Rio Canal bridge traffic woes will continue

There will be no immediate relief from one of Boca Raton’s major traffic annoyances.

That would be replacement of the El Rio Canal bridge on Palmetto Park Road several blocks west of downtown. The work has restricted traffic on that main thoroughfare to one lane.

When the county began the project in August 2021, officials said construction would take about a year. Unfortunately, the new date for completion is late July of next year, according to a county construction supervisor.

He cited “numerous delays in procuring construction materials, as well utility delays.” The bridge on the north side of Palmetto Park Road is complete and work on the new road has started. “Once the roadway portion is completed, eastbound and westbound traffic will shift to the north bridge.” Demolition on the south bridge will follow. And the hassles will continue.

Article Link: Bonds on the Ballot in Delray, and a New Doc’s All American
Auther: Randy Schultz

CRE Landlords, Tenants Fight For Upper Hand In S. Florida

Law360 (September 2, 2022, 4:01 PM EDT) — With economic forces and local market trends driving up prices for South Florida commercial real estate, the mutual needs that marked tenant-landlord relationships during the depths of the pandemic have given way to property owners motivated to seek out technicalities and other creative means to oust tenants in favor of higher-paying replacements, attorneys say.

Continued high demand and limited supply has mostly insulated the South Florida market from the slowdowns seen across the country as a result of recent boosts in inflation and interest rates. But tenants and landlords still find themselves entwined in a sort of dance as each tries to find security and advantages in the uncertain environment.

With prices increasing for South Florida commercial real estate, property owners are motivated to find creative ways to oust tenants in favor of higher-paying replacements, attorneys say. (AP Photo/Wilfredo Lee)

“I’m sure there’s some landlords and tenants who are still working together nicely and all that. But for the most part, with inflation going up and the prices going up, I think there’s a lot of self-preservation involved now, and it doesn’t always work as well as it did in the pandemic when everyone was similarly situated,” Jordan Isrow, a commercial litigator with Fort Lauderdale-based Government Law Group PLLC, told Law360. “I don’t think people are similarly situated now.”

The economy has also put some tenants in positions where they are the ones looking for the exit in the face of changing business fortunes, and the strong market pressures have pushed some property owners to decide their best option is to cash out as well.

In some cases, these diverging factors can lead to litigation, but the accompanying time and cost is often a significant deterrent at a moment when both are precious, opening the door for lawyers and other real estate professionals to pursue some creative solutions of their own, they said.

“There’s a whole lot of possible options and scenarios, and what we’ve become really good at is looking at all those options and helping get the best outcome for our clients,” said Nico Romano, who leads the real estate team at Coral Gables boutique Spiritus Law.

The South Florida region covering Miami-Dade, Broward and Palm Beach counties emerged as one of the hottest real estate markets as the nation climbed back from the COVID-19 pandemic. The area’s mix of warm weather allowing for year-round outdoor activities, favorable tax laws and what were at the time more affordable prices, spurred an influx of people, businesses and capital across just about every real estate segment.

Development has been brisk, but geography has helped keep supply tight, especially in the busiest, most-developed areas in Miami-Dade County, which is sandwiched in an 18-mile-wide strip between the Atlantic Ocean and the protected Everglades.

Nonetheless, the market has stayed strong enough to forge ahead despite the economic headwinds.

“Inflation is never really great … but this upward pressure from inflation, which would normally cool things off, hasn’t really affected South Florida because of all the demand for space,” said Romano, who in addition to his law practice owns some commercial real estate himself.

This high demand, aided by inflation, has sent rents upward. According to second-quarter reports from real estate company Colliers, Miami-Dade County saw retail asking rates reach a record high of $42.10 per square foot, representing a 15% increase since the middle of last year, while office rents jumped 8.7% and industrial rates increased 5.6% amid record low vacancy for that segment.

Palm Beach and Broward counties also set records in retail, after 16.1% and 13.5% year-over-year increases, respectively. Palm Beach County, which is seeing major development in downtown West Palm Beach to accommodate incoming financial firms and other businesses, saw office asking rates vault by 9.1%, while intense demand for industrial space in Broward led to a 22.4% increase for a record $12.18 average rate for triple-net leases.

Erin Byers, a senior managing director at Colliers who specializes in industrial properties, noted that there has been not only an increase in online shopping over the past couple of years, but also a broader shift in consumers wanting just about everything delivered to their homes or available for in-store pickup — and quickly.

“It’s all the companies kind of looking to compete with the 800-pound gorilla Amazon. So it’s those tenants and those tenants offering services to them to create that last-mile or early delivery that continues to fuel the market,” she said, noting that includes food service tenants needing to expand.

But while Byers said she has not seen inflation manage to slow down business in South Florida, she noted that rents have accelerated at a “very high level” over the past few months, resulting in rates soaring by as much as 40% to 60% for some tenants. This trend has affected negotiations over lease renewals, which is typically the only time a landlord has a chance to reset rental rates.

Given the market’s direction, tenants probably want to renew early because finding a new space requires additional time and money, Byers said. But while landlords are generally looking to keep their tenants, in an effort to achieve the highest rent possible, many have been waiting until closer to the expiration date to start talks, rather than the customary six to nine months out.

“Just because the market’s moving so fast, they are looking to see if the market continues to go up and not leave any rental rate on the table,” Byers said. “They also create a leveraging point. If they wait until three months before the lease is expiring, the tenant won’t have time to relocate.”

Having tenants on long-term agreements typically provides a landlord with greater security and enhances property values. However, with today’s dramatic upswing in rates, landlords with long-term tenants now find themselves unable to capitalize on the market.

“When the market is very stable, people look at a property and say, ‘There’s a lease that has 10 years left. That’s very attractive because we have nice predictable income for this property, and the tenant’s going to be there for long term,'” said Louis Archambault, a real estate partner in Miami with Saul Ewing Arnstein & Lehr LLP. “When the market increases very quickly, now they’re saying, ‘Well, I want a building where the leases are all expiring within a year so I can increase them.'”

A tenant in the midst of a long-term lease today likely has a rate that was fair at the time of signing, but is now below market, Isrow of Government Law Group said.

“So a lot of these landlords are getting offers or are getting inquiries from other potential tenants and, of course, they’re all willing to pay a higher dollar amount because that’s what the market provides for now,” Isrow said.

For many of the out-of-state operators entering the region, even the increased rates still seem affordable compared to what they were used to paying in places like the Northeast or California, Romano of Spiritus Law noted.

With replacement tenants on deck and willing to pay more, many landlords are champing at the bit to terminate leases.

Sometimes the solution is as simple as the landlord asking tenants for their price to be bought out of their lease, Romano said, but the challenges of finding a new space or the desirability of the current location may lead a tenant to reject a buyout.

When that happens, landlords often turn to technicalities and other strategies, Isrow said, identifying several potential strategies.

“The first thing I always recommend is that it starts with the lease,” he said. “The lease agreement sets out the road map of what are the possibilities and what are also the risks of trying to go down this road.”

Reviewing monetary grounds is usually the initial step, checking whether the tenant has missed payments on rent, its share of the common building element expenses or taxes, Isrow said.

Then there are nonmonetary obligations, such as failure to obtain or renew tenant’s liability insurance, which is a common requirement. Unauthorized assignment or subletting of the premises is another item to check, with some leases containing restrictive covenants that prohibit particular business uses or storage of certain materials, for example.

Over time, landlords tend to be become more relaxed and long-term tenants may be able to operate more independently, as long as they keep up to date on their rent checks, Isrow said. That was especially true during the pandemic, which required businesses to adapt to unprecedented situations. But in the current environment, landlords are using another common lease provision — the right to entry as landlord — to seek out infractions.

“They want to take a look at the premises and see if it’s in good condition. But by doing that, what they’re really doing now is going in to look to see if there’s anything that the tenant is doing that’s improper or otherwise probably prohibited under the lease to see if they can find the grounds to terminate the lease,” Isrow said.

Another area where Isrow said he has had success helping landlords free up spaces is through technicalities in the lease renewal process itself. Most lease agreements include requirements about how and when to give notice and for the tenant to be in good standing at the time of renewal. In at least one instance, one of Isrow’s clients successfully called out a tenant for not being in good standing at the time it submitted a renewal request.

“Others had been just really nitpicky and technical on the notice provisions,” he added. “You’d be amazed that most people nowadays assume that an email is proper notice, but if an agreement doesn’t expressly provide for that, and it says for some other process, then that’s also been a successful way of doing that.”

Landlords can get even more creative by taking strategic actions to put a tenant in a position where it has trouble satisfying the lease requirements. Many leases include a requirement for tenants to pay for a percentage of common elements, so if a landlord decides to renovate the property’s parking lot, for example, a tenant who is already struggling to cope with increased business costs and facing higher interest rates may not be able to come up with the needed money. Additionally, the work may temporarily remove access to facilities the business relies upon, making it harder for the company to continue operating in that space.

“Some of those things can be used tactically because it’s allowed for in the lease,” Isrow said. “It puts the tenant in a tough spot. They’ve agreed that the landlord can do the work. Of course, the landlord has to be careful not to do anything intentional to make it more problematic, but sometimes just by virtue of the work itself, it can interfere with an operation. And a landlord who has the right reason to do the work can usually use that to their advantage.”

From the tenant’s perspective, businesses that are looking to get out of leases, for example for retail spaces or offices that are now bigger than they need, are likely to be able to successfully negotiate a buyout with their landlords, Romano said. Some may also look into the possibility of subletting space, if allowed under the lease.

There are circumstances, however, that can lead to litigation, the most likely being where a landlord is blatantly trying to manufacture a technicality to terminate the lease and where it would be particularly burdensome or detrimental to the tenant to have to move to another location, Romano said.

“You have to find out what ultimately is the desire of your client,” he said. “If this is the only possible place, OK, you dig in your heels.”

Many leases contain attorney fees provisions, which require the losing side to cover the prevailing party’s legal costs. That gives a tenant that feels it has a very strong case greater opportunity to take a landlord to court, but also poses an additional financial risk, the attorneys said.

“There’s a lot more risk in terms of not just having to pay your own attorney, but having to double that to pay the other side,” Isrow said. “So I think the primary rule is avoid litigation, if at all possible, and it’s kind of the last resort.”

Creative steps can also help resolve a sticky situation for the various sides.

“Everyone wants something. It’s just a matter of discovering what that is and making sure it works for everybody,” Romano said. “Whether it be one way or another, it’s — I don’t want to say fun — but we have a knack for coming up with things that may be out of the box.”

Drawing from his own experience as a landlord, Romano recounted a situation in which a tenant with a substantial lease was seeking either to receive a buyout or pay some minimal amount to exit a lease. He was able to find a developer that was interested in the property and ended up selling it for a price he wanted, while the tenant did not have to pay a substantial amount for the remainder of the lease as part of the agreement.

“So I was able to save everybody money, aggravation and time by figuring out how to make it work for everybody,” he said.

Romano’s experience is one example of the current market conditions contributing to a property owner deciding to sell. The economy has also resulted in some landlords finding themselves in situations where they almost have no choice but to sell, the attorneys said.

“Owners that have properties where their debt service is very high, or they are in a situation with a property that may require a lot of improvements, and they don’t have the equity or the cash flow to be able to make those improvements, they’re most likely going to have to sell just because of the market conditions,” Saul Ewing’s Archambault said. “Unless they’re able to fix those deficiencies, they may not have a choice.”

Looking ahead, the experts said while there is the possibility that conditions will worsen into a recession, they are cautiously optimistic that inflation will level out, and the market will adjust and move forward at the new rates and price points.

“There’s a lot of worry related to uncertainty, but it’s vastly different than what we had at the end of the 2000s, where financial institutions were in a recession and there was instability in the financial institutions,” Archambault said. “It’s just interest rates that are rising. … The banks are fine financially. They’re just charging more in interest for the loans.”

Colliers’ Byers said she thinks the South Florida market has some significant factors that will keep driving it forward, but there are limits. As rates keep rising, businesses looking to expand may have to rethink those plans, and some tenants may eventually get squeezed out to second-tier markets, especially in the industrial segment where space is at such a premium.

“Rates and valuations of buildings can go up for only so long before they have to level, just from an ability to withstand those increases,” she said. “I feel comfortable and confident in our market. However, I do realize that not everyone can afford to double their line item of their expenses just with rent alone.”

–Editing by Jill Coffey.

Article Link: CRE Landlords, Tenants Fight For Upper Hand In S. Florida
Auther: Nathan Hale

Large self-storage facility may be coming to Atlantic Avenue and Turnpike intersection

Rendering of large self-storage facility at the intersection of Atlantic Avenue and the Turnpike west of Delray Beach – Neil Schiller, Attorney For The Applicant

The country’s largest self-storage company, Public Storage, is looking to build a three-story facility on the southwest corner of Florida’s Turnpike and Atlantic Avenue.

The County Zoning Commission on Aug. 25 granted a necessary variance, the first approval in what will be a lengthy process to build a three-story, 71,259 square-foot facility on a vacant parcel west of Delray Beach in an unincorporated area of the county.

According to documents submitted to the county, the 1.8-acre parcel is often used by vagrants. It is full of beer bottles and litter. Cars are parked on it illegally.

“This (a self-storage building) would be a major upgrade,” said Neil Schiller, the attorney for the applicant.

The variance was needed because the parcel is currently part of the Waterways planned unit development that was built nearly 30 years ago. All such developments need to have frontage on a major highway. In this case, it was on Atlantic Avenue.

Schiller explained that the requirement now needs to be waived to allow the facility to be built as the parcel serves as the development’s Atlantic Avenue frontage.

Schiller noted that the approval will not affect the ability of residents to enter and exit the 189-unit gated community. “Everything will stay the same,” he said, adding that both the residents and the users of the storage facility will use Tranquility Way, the access road into the Waterways off Atlantic Avenue.

Vacant lot in red is where a large self-storage facility would be built west of Delray Beach at the Atlantic Avenue and Turnpike intersection – Neil Schiller, Attorney For The Applicant

Staff recommended that the variance be denied, arguing that the granting would “confer a special privilege” to the applicant since all other planned unit developments have had to comply with the frontage requirement.

Staff noted that when the Waterways’ development was approved, it met the frontage requirement. Removing it now creates an “inconsistency with the requirements of the county’s zoning code,” staff reported.

But the zoning commission accepted Schiller’s argument that without the variance, the property owner would be stuck with a property that could not be built upon, creating “an undue hardship.” And Schiller noted that both the Waterways HOA and the Alliance of Delray Residential Associations support the project. Other projects under consideration included a gas station and a fast-food restaurant. Such projects, he said, would create far more congestion than a self-storage building.

With the variance approval, Schiller will return to county officials asking that the land area be deleted from the Waterways’ development and that a land-use change be approved as well. Without the variance, the project could not have moved forward.

The zoning commission had the ability to grant the variance change on its own. The subsequent applications will need the approval of county commissioners. According to Schiller, there have been six other parcels at Turnpike intersections with commercial elements.

Public hearings are expected to be conducted early next year. If approvals are granted, construction could begin sometime in 2024.

To gain the support of the Waterways HOA, Public Storage addressed all the association’s concerns, Schiller said. It went so far as to redesign the site plan to make it more palatable to the HOA and it even took the color orange out of much of the project. Orange is the company’s corporate color and almost all of its buildings have a large dose of orange, he noted.

“They didn’t like it so we removed almost all of it,” Schiller said. “We did everything they wanted.”

Mike Diamond is a journalist at the Palm Beach Post, part of the USA TODAY Florida Network. He covers county government and transportation. You can reach him atmdiamond@pbpost.com. Help support local journalism. Subscribe today.

Legal battle ramps up at waterfront Bal Harbour condo building

Former unit owner and her buyers allege board president Joseph Swedroe is engaging in “self-dealing”

Joseph Swedroe and 286 Bal Bay Drive (Getty Images, Google Maps, Eleventh Circuit Court)

Current and former unit owners at a boutique waterfront building in Bal Harbour allege that the condo board president has illegally obtained control, with the goal of ultimately terminating the association and redeveloping the property.

Litigation between Water’s Edge House condo board president Joseph Swedroe and former unit owner Marlene Feuerring dates back nearly two decades. Swedroe, who is a partner at his father’s architecture firm and a real estate agent with Beachfront Realty, owns seven of the 11 units at Water’s Edge House, built in 1954, at 286 Bal Bay Drive.

At the root of the dispute is that Feuerring and the now-owners of her former units allege Swedroe has illegally claimed the right of first refusal to purchase units when they become available without going through the correct process. Swedroe and the association allege that Feuerring violated the condo declaration by bypassing the association.

If Swedroe were to acquire enough units to eventually terminate the association, he could sell the property to a developer for a significant markup or redevelop it himself. Developers are increasingly targeting older properties through condo buyouts because little undeveloped waterfront land is left. And in the year since the deadly condo collapse in Surfside, more owners are willing to sell.

Swedroe, his attorney, Aaron Behar, and the condo association’s lawyer, Evan Berger, did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

According to Miami-Dade court filings, Feuerring had entered into a deal in November of last year to sell her units to a non-Swedroe buyer, but Swedroe wanted to purchase the units. The board was unable to vote to exercise the right of first refusal on Feuerring’s units because two of the three board members had a financial interest in the outcome of the sale, a.k.a. a conflict of interest.

But at an emergency special meeting in December of last year, seven of the 10 unit owners present voted in favor of the association purchasing the units with Swedroe as the true buyer, according to court filings. Swedroe is listed as a manager of the LLCs that own six units and he owns one unit in his name, giving him the seven votes.

After the vote, Swedroe notified Feuerring and her buyer that he was “ready, willing, and able to close” on the units, according to the lawsuit he filed against her last year in Miami-Dade Circuit Court. Feuerring “refused to cooperate” and said she will not sell the condos to him without a court order, according to his complaint.

A judge dismissed Swedroe’s lawsuit with prejudice, court records show, and Feuerring’s buyer backed out. She ended up selling the units to her real estate agents, Lisa Miller and Hayley Sloman of The Girlz LLC in March for $1.7 million, property records show.

Swedroe and Feuerring’s disputes date back to 2004, when Swedroe sued Water’s Edge House and unit owners, including Feuerring and her late husband, Ralph. That complaint is not available online. In 2020, Feuerring sued the condo association and Swedroe, alleging that Swedroe breached his fiduciary duties “by engaging in self-dealing” as association president, for allegedly failing to maintain and repair the common spaces, resulting in water intrusion to Feuerring’s property, which ultimately devalued her units.

Fast forward to this year, in May, when Water’s Edge House sued Feuerring, Miller, Sloman and The Girlz LLC for breach of contract and equitable, declaratory, and injunctive relief after Feuerring sold her unit to The Girlz LLC. A hearing on whether the case will be transferred to complex business court is set for Sept. 9.

The defendants – Feuerring, Miller, Sloman and The Girlz LLC – seek the court’s appointment of a receiver to take over the association. They allege that Swedroe has perpetrated the association’s alleged “flagrant breach of fiduciary duties and gross mismanagement” through “years of unchecked self-dealing and breaches” of the condo declaration. They claim Swedroe has led the charge on special assessments to all owners at the building to fund his lawsuit against Feuerring.

Attorney Jordan Isrow of Government Law Group, representing Feuerring, and her buyers in the lawsuit, said that once a majority owner has control of the association, it leaves the remaining owners with little leverage.

“It’s time for people to start realizing,” Isrow said. “It may not be relevant today, but these are the decisions that snowball unless you’re actively participating” in the decisions that boards make.

Isrow said the association doesn’t have the meeting minutes that statute requires, documenting previous votes on exercising its right of first refusal for previous purchases.

“A lot of these people are older or part-timers and they aren’t paying attention as much,” Isrow said, referring to aging condo communities in South Florida. “This is the tip of the iceberg. My hope is we can get a good result.”

Article Link: Legal battle ramps up at waterfront Bal Harbour condo building
Auther: Katherine Kallergis

As Fight Over South Florida Condo Termination Intensifies, Expect More Litigation as Developers Pursue New Buildings

“A lot of condo associations seem to go unchecked. It’s not to say that they do anything wrong, but the truth is, a lot of people aren’t paying attention to what their condo board does. Especially in something like this particular building, where a lot of its members are part-time residents,” said Jordan Isrow of Government Law Group. “You may not see something is happening to your building or not happening to your building until it’s too late.”

As condo associations and developers look to take advantage of older buildings to capitalize on South Florida’s increased property values, condo termination litigation is bound to increase. But that can also create problems for condo owners as some may try to illegally profit off of the trend.

That’s an allegation at the heart of a lawsuit against Miami architect heir and Water’s Edge Condominium Association president and board chair. Joseph Swedroe of Bal Harbour, who owns seven of the 11 units at Water’s Edge condominium, is accused of unlawfully self-dealing to gain control of the majority of the units.

The property is located at 286 Bal Bay Drive in Bal Harbour.

It’s a case that demonstrates why associations might need a receiver to keep things fair for everyone, as attorney Jordan Isrow of Government Law Group in Fort Lauderdale sees it.

Isrow represents the defendants who are condo unit owners where Swedroe is on the board.

Jordan Isrow of Government Law Group in Fort Lauderdale.

“A lot of condo associations seem to go unchecked. It’s not to say that they do anything wrong, but the truth is, a lot of people aren’t paying attention to what their condo board does. Especially in something like this particular building, where a lot of its members are part-time residents,” said Isrow. “You may not see something is happening to your building, or not happening to your building, until it’s too late.”

Attorney Evan Berger of Becker & Poliakoff in Fort Lauderdale represents the condo association, and attorney Daniel Gielchinsky of DGIM Law in Bay Harbour Islands represented Swedroe in his lawsuit. Neither responded to a request for comment by deadline.

Isrow’s clients allege that Swedroe wanted to buy two units from owner Marlene Feurring so that he could own nine of the 11 units in the condominium. The lawsuit claims Swedroe used his control of the board to charge special assessments to all unit owners to fund the lawsuit against them for the benefit of Swedroe personally with any legitimate benefit to the members of the association at large.

“Our belief is that he’s wanting to gain 80% plus ownership requirement statutorily allow him to terminate the condominium which would then give him the right to control the destiny of a very valuable piece of real estate in Bal Harbor on the water right by the inland,” said Isrow.

The case first came to Isrow when Water’s Edge Declaration of Condominium sued Feuerring, claiming that the association has the right of first refusal to buy any unit that was offered for sale. The association claimed the seller violated the “clear and enforceable requirement of the declaration” when Feuerring sold her units to Lisa Miller and Haley Sloman without first providing the association with the opportunity to purchase them.

“She gave notice to the association, but at the time there were only two board members, one of which was Joseph Swedroe,” said Isrow. “The association’s own general counsel advised him that he could not vote on the right of first refusal because he had a conflict of interest, so she was ready to move forward with the sale but before she could do so there was a lawsuit filed by Swedroe individually.”

Isrow said Swedroe filed a lis pendens to stop the sale, seeking to force Feuerring to sell the units under the right of first refusal.

“We went for an emergency hearing that he did not have legal standing because he is not the association and the association is the only one that had that vote initially, and without a proper vote, there is no exercising right of first refusal,” said Isrow. “It was very unusual because it rarely happens.”

That case was dismissed with prejudice, and Swedroe was ordered to pay the defendant’s attorney’s fees. Now, there are two additional board members, who Isrow claims are Swedroe’s sister and the CEO of his father’s architect firm.

“They do not live in the building. They do not own any of the units in the building. They were just designated by Joe Swedroe or just requested that they step in to be candidates and they were elected,” said Isrow.

Isrow said after the election, the association started to investigate the sale of Feuerring’s former units. Feuerring, Miller and Sloman have countersued, asking the court to appoint a receiver to oversee the association and the board.

“Even assuming that they were going to void the transaction, which we don’t think will happen, that only gets you back to the status quo. That means Marlene goes back to being the owner of the unit and the buyer is no longer the new owner,” said Isrow. “Marlene has made clear she will never sell to Joe Swedroe. She will hold onto it and gift it to her son or grandson.”

Isrow said the lawsuit epitomizes why the association needs a receiver.

“Without any of the other unit owners having a say in the voting, keep in mind he owns seven of the 11 units, anytime there’s even an at-large vote he trumps all the other unit owner’s votes. There’s no alternative remedy to seek help,” said Isrow. “The only viable alternative here is a receiver and that’s the direction we’re going in.”

With an increase in property values there’s a lot of money to be made, and older condos that are redeveloped could be worth something in the multimillion-dollar range. Isrow said he expects to see similar cases in the future.

For attorneys who represent condo owners who may find themselves in a similar situation, Isrow advises being extremely detail-oriented.

“Make as many records requests as possible because, statutorily, the association is required by law to maintain certain records,” Isrow said. “If those records aren’t being kept or they never existed in the first place, whichever may be the case, that’s a very important barometer of whether that is something of concern.”

Article Link: As Fight Over South Florida Condo Termination Intensifies, Expect More Litigation as Developers Pursue New Buildings
Auther: Melea VanOstrand