What you need to know about Florida today – Tuesday’s Afternoon Update

Florida Trend Exclusive
Legal Elite — Notable Managing Partners

Florida offers plenty of examples of elite leadership traits. Florida has the fastest-growing lawyer population, according to recent data from the American Bar Association. In the past decade, the number of active resident lawyers has grown by approximately 17%, ranking Florida fourth among states in lawyer population. The Florida Bar counts more than 115,000 members statewide. More from Florida Trend.

Florida business establishment remains quiet on property tax amendment

Less than four months before Floridians vote on a proposal to phase out property taxes for homeowners, there’s no organized campaign seeking to move the measure past the 60% vote required for passage. The biggest advocate for property tax relief, Gov. Ron DeSantis, said two weeks ago that he won’t lead any organized effort because the measure the Legislature approved in a special session in June “wasn’t my proposal.” Three groups, most recently a political committee called Floridians for Shared Prosperity, have formed to oppose Amendment 3. Cities and counties would lose $5 billion in tax revenue next year and $10.75 billion by 2031, according to state economists. More from the Florida Phoenix.

What is space jellyfish? Unique rocket launch contrails explained

The “space jellyfish” effect — illuminated rocket exhaust plumes that follow a launch around dawn or dusk — has developed a cult following online. The phenomenon is not dangerous; it occurs when a rocket lifts off in the hours around dawn or dusk and the exhaust plumes are illuminated by the sun just over the horizon. In rare cases, the contrail can transform into another shape — including a heart, as happened in March 2026 and July 2026 in Florida. More from Florida Today.

Florida Airport Seeks Airline Service After 17-Year Gap

Monroe County is seeking to restart commercial air service at Florida Keys Marathon Airport after a nearly 20-year gap, applying for a $1 million federal grant through the Department of Transportation’s Small Community Air Service Development Program. The money would make up part of a roughly $2.5 million minimum revenue guarantee for an airline that opts to start service. The county is looking to partner with United, Delta, or American, and has already begun discussions with American. More from Airline Geeks.

FIFA Fan Festival in Miami draws 600,000 attendees as World Cup shifts to final matches

The FIFA Miami Host Committee says the World Cup Fan Festival at Bayfront Park drew 600,000 attendees over 24 days. The 24-day event has wrapped, but the World Cup experience is continuing across South Florida. More from the South Florida Business Journal.

Article Link: Tuesday’s Afternoon Update – What you need to know about Florida today

What They’re Saying About Fla. Real Estate At 2026’s Midpoint

Florida has experienced its share of real estate boom and bust cycles over the years, but while the first half of 2026 fell short of the recent past, attorneys and other industry experts say the state appears poised to buck that pattern, and that more growth lies ahead.

Around the midpoint of the year, Law360 Real Estate Authority asked a cross section of real estate professionals, including attorneys, developers and brokers, to share their assessment of the year so far and where they see things headed, as well as what trends and issues they are watching, including in the courts and at various levels of government.

“We continue to monitor for any signs of distress, but the distress that many have been waiting years for has failed to materialize thus far except in unique instances more specific to an asset,” said Jordan Kornberg, chief investment officer at Mast Capital, a Miami-based real estate development and investment firm.

“People continue to talk about South Florida as the same ‘boom or bust’ market it had historically been. I don’t think people understand how the factors driving a lot of the demand across the market are different than they were in the past,” he added. “With a significant increase in companies relocating to Florida and more end users buying condos, the market has characteristics that are different and we think will lead to pockets of the market performing differently than they had in the past.”

Sizing Up the First Half

In many cases, “rebalancing” or “recalibrating” could be interpreted as euphemisms used to describe signs of a downturn in a market.

And as Tyler Davis, president at land brokerage Saunders Real Estate, acknowledged, “There have been several positives and some negatives in the Florida real estate economy in 2026 so far.”

Davis and BTI Partners CEO Noah Breakstone both said Florida’s real estate market has “remained resilient” in 2026 despite high interest rates, insurance pressures and oversupply in certain sectors, particularly multifamily residential.

“Demand remained resilient but more discerning,” Breakstone said. “Domestic migration slowed frorr post-COVID peaks — influenced by return-to-office trends and prior surges — but stayed positive, supporting inflows to Florida’s major metros.”

But context remains important in gauging Florida’s performance, several commenters noted, especially given the success the state just experienced.

“While the first half of 2026 reflects a period of stabilizing when comparing it to the frothiness of the first few years of spectacular growth in Florida post-COVID, it seems to me that the first half of 2026 still shows Florida, in particular South Florida and especially Miami and West Palm Beach, as extremely resilient, with major projects being developed by very-well capitalized developers,” said Eric Rapkin, real estate practice group chair at Akerman LLP.

“Overall, the Florida market is recalibrating. We are still defining what a normalized market might look like,” added Mark Levy, chief investment officer at FRP Development Corp., which has a portfolio of commercial, industrial and multifamily real estate. “We literally condensed so much growth into a three-year period that we forget markets don’t behave that way. It was tantamount to a war footing. Now, we have to digest and figure out what the right cadence is going forward.”

Danny Diaz Leyva, chair of the Florida real estate practice at Day Pitney LLP, also noted that commercial real estate, while generally strong in the first half, began at a slower pace than many anticipated. But he pointed out that the slower start was largely in comparison to significant momentum at the end of 2025, coupled with expectations from many investors that interest rates might decline, which has not materialized.

“The defining story of 2026 is not that the market has slowed — it is that the market has adapted,” he said. “Investors are no longer waiting for yesterday’s interest-rate environment to return. They are restructuring capital, adjusting underwriting, and continuing to transact within today’s realities. That adjustment is creating a healthier, more disciplined market for the long term.”

Several sources spoke about seeing considerable activity on the financing front, both for construction and recapitalization, and also about the considerable breadth of activity.

“In my 20-plus years of practice, I cannot recall a time period when I have seen so many construction financings occurring in the marketplace across so many different types of developments,” said Luis Flores, a partner at Saul Ewing LLP. “In most boom cycles, we see a concentration in one particular asset class, i.e., luxury condominiums, office buildings or rental apartments; however, the current development activity is not limited to a single asset class.”

Leyva said a focus on recapitalizations and equity infusions continued in the first half, with sponsors “bringing in new capital partners, restructuring existing capital stacks, and extending investment horizons rather than selling assets into a market where pricing has not yet fully recovered.” He said this has been particularly evident in the multifamily sector.

And while domestic migration has slowed from its pandemic-era surge, BTI’s Breakstone noted that it is still significant from traditional sources in the Midwest and Northeast, along with increased inflow from California and Texas. International capital was also a standout for South Florida luxury condos, he said.

“What has been somewhat surprising is the diversity of the buyer pool,” added Christine Martinez de Castro, chief marketing and sales officer for Miami-based development firm CMC Group.

Looking at different market segments, demand for single-family homes pulled back from its boom-era levels due to affordability issues, Breakstone and Saunders’ Davis said, with builders offering incentives such as rate buydowns, closing cost credits and price adjustments.

New residential construction permits statewide declined notably, Breakstone added, with about 24,800 in the first quarter, down more than 12% year over year after already slowing in 2025. “This reflected builder caution amid demand signals, costs and elevated interest rates,” he said.

Meanwhile, sources described multifamily rentals as a “mixed bag,” noting pressures from oversupply but also long-term confidence as supply is absorbed and the construction pipeline slows. South Florida, which Breakstone said ranked first nationally in multifamily construction activity, nevertheless remained strong in the sector. But other metro markets, including parts of Tampa, showed softening, according to Breakstone and Akerman’s Rapkin.

Keith Poliakoff, managing partner in the Fort Lauderdale office of Government Law Group PLLC said one of the biggest surprises has been the speed at which older condos, burdened by heightened state building safety and financial regulations, became difficult to finance.

“The condo market has split in two,” Poliakoff said. “Newer buildings continue to perform well, while many older condominiums are facing declining values because of insurance costs, reserve requirements, and limited financing options. Even modest interest rate relief hasn’t offset soaring insurance and ownership costs.”

On the other hand, luxury continued to be a strong point, particularly with wealth migration serving as a market driver, noted Ed Jahn, senior vice president of Kolter Urban, which is developing across multiple Florida submarkets. He added that consistent, if selective, demand has helped maintain development momentum in high-end downtown and coastal locations.

Retail had a good first half, buoyed by population growth, and industrial has also performed well, driven by logistics, e-commerce and business expansion, the experts said.

The South Florida office sector has also continued to outshine national numbers, with vacancy in Miami falling sharply to the low 12% range, one of the lowest rates among major U.S. markets, while featuring the highest average asking rents in the South, according to Asher Abadi, principal at Four West Developers, which is developing an office project in Hollywood, Florida.

“The nation believes office is in decline, but Miami told the opposite story,” Abadi said. “Corporate relocations and finance-sector growth, such as JPMorgan, Citadel, Amazon and Palantir, are pulling capital and headquarters out of higher-tax states faster than we can build space to hold them.”

Every asset class had sectors that performed well and those that continued to struggle, FRP’s Levy said.

“[With] industrial, it’s small bay, serving tenants under 10,000 square feet [that is doing well]. Office, it’s the top-tier Class A sector; hotels, it’s the luxury segment, as it is retail. Multifamily again skews luxury condos, but the middle market is squeezed given a shallowing middle class,” he said.

From the standpoint of different submarkets, Miami and West Palm Beach “continue to distinguish themselves,” Leyva said. “Both markets remain magnets for capital, talent and affluent migration, with investment continuing to flow from the Northeast, Latin America, and increasingly other international markets. Those demographic and capital trends continue to underpin demand across multiple asset classes and reinforce South Florida’s position as one of the country’s most attractive Iong-term real estate market.”

Several Gulf Coast markets also garnered mention for strong performances, including St. Petersburg, Naples and Sarasota, along with some growth corridors around Orlando, such as Lake Nona, and master-planned communities in the Jacksonville area.

Open-Eyed Optimism

The industry experts shared an overall positive outlook for the second half of 2026 and beyond, while acknowledging they will be keeping an eye on several headwinds.

Both Mast Capital’s Kornberg and Akerman’s Rapkin described themselves as “bullish” on the state’s prospects, and they were joined by a chorus of sources expressing their optimism.

“I think the second half of the year will continue to be strong. Miami continues to be showcased on the world stage, and more and more people are coming to Miami for the lifestyle and the business,” CMC Group’s Martinez de Castro said. “There are always some growing pains that come with growth and change, but I believe we are living through a remarkable period in Miami’s history. We are witnessing the city’s evolution into a true global destination and world-class city, and it is exciting to be a part of that transformation.”

Based on the number of financing term sheets his team has received recently, Saul Ewing’s Flores said he expects the current deal flow of Florida real estate projects to continue for the rest of the year and into the first quarter of 2027.

“Besides the financing activity, we have also seen an influx of requests to prepare fund and investment capitalization packages, which is the first step to further land acquisitions and future development,” he said. “As long as the demand for real estate products continues, both local and foreign investors and lenders will continue putting their dollars into Florida real estate.”

Four West’s Abadi said the South Florida office market presents a rare situation where there has been “historic-low construction, scarce prime supply and [corporate] relocation flows that show no sign of slowing.”

“When firm demand meets a market that physically can’t add inventory for years, rents hold, and well-positioned assets keep performing. We expect prime South Florida office rents to climb through year-end and into next year,” he said.

Tere Blanca, founder, chair and CEO of Blanca Commercial Real Estate, also said the outlook is strong for commercial leasing demand to continue the pace observed in the first half, with the potential for an uptick in new-to-market companies from New York and California.

On the residential front, Hugo Arza, Miami real estate practice group leader at Holland & Knight LLP, said conditions are improving for single-family home development, with sellers reconsidering their positions and not wanting to lose out on selling their land. Breakstone said single-family homes are on pace to post modest year-over-year gains, but construction will “stay cautious” as builders focus on clearing existing product from their pipelines.

“Given the long lead time for development approvals, permitting and construction, however, even projects that start back up now in the second half of 2026 will not be delivered until later 2027 or 2028,” Arza added.

Andy Ansin, CEO of Sunbeam Properties — which is developing the Miramar Cove, a $1 billion, 125-acre mixed-use project in Broward County — was one of several sources who highlighted what he called a “clear shift” toward mixed-use developments combining residential, office, retail, hospitality and entertainment in one place.

“People are looking for more convenience in their daily lives. They want to spend less time commuting and more time enjoying where they live, work and gather,” Ansin said.

Wellness amenities are in demand for both offices and luxury residential. “It is worth reinforcing just how important wellness has become in the luxury residential market,” CMC’s Martinez de Castro said. “Today, true luxury cannot exist without a meaningful wellness component.”

While money may be no object for a segment of the market, affordability is a major factor that experts said will influence the market’s direction.

“Florida’s demographics will change based on where people ultimately can afford to live,” FRP Development’s Levy said.

“Long term, I think South Florida will really skew towards serving a more affluent demographic. Tampa and Orlando will grow considerably as population shifts look for better value, and Jacksonville could emerge as a further growth beneficiary over time,” he added.

Interest rates, and in turn mortgage rates, will also play a big role.

“Further stabilization or rate declines would boost affordability, accelerate absorption/sales, support prices, and potentially encourage more measured new construction,” Breakstone said. “Persistent stickiness around plus-6% would prolong builders’ use of incentives, slower absorption for new product and cautious starts.”

“Optimism about future rate cuts is dwindling, and it will be interesting to see whether this puts merchant development of industrial and apartments into another holding period,” Saunders Real Estate’s Davis added.

Migration into the state is another factor the industry will be watching closely, several sources said. Sustained or increased numbers of businesses, employees and their families, as well as retirees coming to the state would tighten inventory and encourage construction starts, in turn supporting all real estate segments, Breakstone said.

Sources also expressed hope for economic and political certainty.

“Miami tends to perform better than most cities during periods of uncertainty because of its global appeal and continued demand. However, instability and uncertainty on the world stage will always have some impact on real estate sales,” Martinez de Castro said. “Maintaining confidence in the market remains important as we move through the second half of the year.”

And one factor that cannot be overlooked in Florida is the state’s hurricane season, which officially runs from June 1 through Nov. 30, Akerman’s Rapkin pointed out.

“It was exactly 100 years ago in September 1926 that a massive hurricane devastated the entire region, including Miami, Miami Beach, Hollywood, Fort Lauderdale and Palm Beach, and which was likely the inciting cause of the complete crash of the Florida real estate market, which had been booming in the first years of the 1920s — although of course there were economic factors at play as well,” Rapkin said.

At the Capitol and in the Courts

The hottest policy topic related to Florida real estate this year has been a push, led in large part by Gov. Ron DeSantis, to slash or even eliminate property taxes. The idea has generated controversy, as it would greatly reduce local governments’ revenues. But lawmakers in the Republican-controlled Legislature ultimately decided to put a proposed constitutional amendment before voters in November that would increase both the state’s homestead exemption and the cap on annual ‘assessment’ increases for other properties.

Ahead of the vote, the “Save Our Homes from Excessive Property Taxes” ballot question faces a legal challenge that alleges it is misleading.

Akerman’s Rapkin said he thinks passage is likely but noted the 60% approval threshold required for passage.

Two other familiar policy topics continued to stay top of mind.

Florida lawmakers have devoted significant time to incentivize the construction of more affordable and workforce housing through 2023’s Live Local Act and later amendments, and to reforming condominium safety and financial regulations in the wake of the deadly 2021 collapse of the Champlain Towers South condominium building.

Both issues remain important topics in 2026, although the Florida Legislature passed further amendments to expand and add teeth to the Live Local Act but did not act to address concerns about the financial burdens the new condo regulations have imposed on unit owners and associations.

“Florida’s new condo safety laws have made buildings safer but placed enormous financial pressure on many owners. At the same time, stricter Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac lending standards are making it difficult to finance units in older buildings,” Government Law Group’s Poliakoff said. “The Legislature needs to address affordability for condo owners, particularly through financing solutions that help fixed-income residents pay mandatory assessments to keep their building safe.”

The strains caused by new mandates for inspections and collecting financial reserves also have sparked legal battles over special assessments imposed on unit owners, Poliakoff said.

In House Bill 1389, which DeSantis signed into law, lawmakers made land owned by local governments, school districts and houses of worship eligible for redevelopment using the Live Local Act’s tax breaks. The law also streamlined administrative approvals and strengthened requirements for local governments to participate in those tax breaks, and it extended Florida Fair Housing Act protections to prohibit discrimination against projects on the basis of their using those benefits.

The latter could be of particular importance, as several lawyers mentioned they were watching challenges to the Live Local Act from local governments seeking control over land use matters, which are largely preempted for projects that fit within the law’s parameters.

“Live Local will continue to help developers obtain approvals for workforce housing as well as other projects due to the threat of implementing Live Local,” Sunbeam Properties’ Ansin said.

Holland & Knight’s Arza said he will be monitoring the impact of Senate Bill 1434, also known as the Infill Redevelopment Act. Somewhat similar to the Live Local Act, this new law preempts local zoning and land use regulations to authorize residential development on “environmentally impacted” land of 5 acres or more in Miami-Dade, Broward and Palm Beach counties, where extensive development has made available developable land scarce.

“How this new regulation plays out, particularly in the context of larger tracts such as golf courses, could be market moving,” Arza said.

In terms of federal policy, Saul Ewing’s Flores said Florida real estate could experience disruptions if Congress does not confirm later this year that the EB-5 investment visa program, which has been an important source of capital for developers, will be extended beyond its September 2027 expiration date. While a year remains until the program’s scheduled sunset, this September marks the deadline for certain guarantees for applicants.

Additionally, Ansin said there is hope that the 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act will result in an increase in affordable and workforce housing. “This is particularly important in South Florida, where we have strict environmental regulations and often long and expensive permitting processes,” he said.

The three biggest federal policies that can affect the second half of 2026 and next year are tariffs, immigration and interest rates, Blanca said.

“All three of these policies have impact on the cost of construction and overall dynamics across the real estate sector. Higher cost of goods, labor and capital may result in less new supply and less capital being invested across the industry,” she said.

Experts also offered their thoughts on additional issues that they said need to be addressed.

Saunders Real Estate’s Davis said he does not think enough attention has been paid to how much agricultural land in Florida has been converted for development this decade, saying his firm’s “Lay of the Land” report has estimated 177,000 usable acres of farmland have been lost since 2020.

“Growth is inevitable, but increasing density in cities and municipalities is critically important to slow down the urban sprawl,” he said.

He called for the Florida Legislature to increase funding for conservation efforts, including the conservation easement option, which allows owners to continue using land for farming while selling the state development rights.

Ansin raised the need for more high-quality private schools in South Florida.

“We continue to welcome families from the Northeast and across the country, but the number of available seats at top private schools hasn’t kept pace with that growth,” he said. “For many parents, finding the right school is just as important as finding the right home.”

Blanca also mentioned the need to address schools, but suggested the Legislature should look at improving quality K-12 public education along with mass transit and housing affordability.

“Those three pillars are essential to continue growth across Florida and may be successfully addressed in numerous ways, including facilitating the expansion of mass transit and development projects connected to mass transit, new laws that result in lower cost of housing and public-private partnerships for quality education programming,” she said.

Article Link: What They’re Saying About Fla. Real Estate At 2026’s Midpoint
Author: Nathan Hale

Florida Trend Managing Partners

Keith Poliakoff

Managing Partners

In Fort Lauderdale, Keith Poliakoff drives business development, oversees firmwide compliance, champions pro bono initiatives and maintains an active client caseload representing local governments, as well as parties before local governments statewide. That includes all aspects of developer representation relating to land use, zoning, development agreements and other matters. Under his leadership, the firm has expanded its footprint and cultivated a culture rooted in ethics, performance and inclusion. Poliakoff’s extensive pro bono work spans housing insecurity, veteran advocacy and community impact.

Lawsuit aims to stop private condo from being built on public beachfront in Hollywood

A luxury condo tower slated to rise on public land at the beach is the target of a lawsuit that accuses Hollywood of breaking its own rules and laws to make way for the project and its controversial 99-year ground lease.

The lawsuit, filed last week in Broward Circuit Court, lists the city of Hollywood and Miami-based Related Group as defendants in a case that could dictate what happens to the land at 1301 S. Ocean Drive.

The parcel, deeded to Hollywood more than 50 years ago, is now home to a park and community center.

If the project breaks ground, Related Group plans to build a 30-story tower that will stand 365 high. The project calls for 210 residences: 126 luxury condos and 84 workforce apartments.

Kathleen DiBona, named as a plaintiff along with the newly formed nonprofit Keep Public Lands Public Inc., can see the land in question from her balcony on the 14th floor of the nearby Oxford Towers condo.

By filing the lawsuit, she hopes to bring the project to a permanent end.

“I feel strongly it is the right thing to do regarding protecting our public lands,” DiBona told the South Florida Sun Sentinel this week. “The lawsuit truly speaks for itself.”

The multi-count complaint argues that a 99-year lease of public land requires voter approval by referendum.

The lawsuit also claims the property is subject to a recorded deed restriction limiting its use to open space, park, recreational and other public and municipal purposes.

The complaint accuses the city of approving the deal without putting the question on the ballot to get voter input as required by the city charter and a city ordinance that mandates a voter referendum before park or beachfront property east of the Intracoastal Waterway can be sold, leased or encumbered for 50 years or more.

Hollywood commissioners signed off on the comprehensive agreement and ground lease four years ago in May 2022.

A Hollywood spokeswoman declined to comment on the lawsuit, saying the city had not yet been served.

Keith Poliakoff, attorney for Related Group, said he and his client were confident the lawsuit would be dismissed.

“They have absolutely zero standing and missed the boat to sue by four years,” Poliakoff said. “It’s going to be interesting to see who is getting stuck holding the bag for the attorneys’ fees. This case will be dismissed faster than the ink dried on the filing, and we are not going to hesitate to collect the fee judgement that we are about to obtain.”

Ryan Abrams, attorney for the plaintiffs, told the Sun Sentinel his clients had until May 2027 to file the lawsuit.

“There’s a five-year statute of limitations,” he said. “I don’t know what he means by that. That’s what courts are for. This is a sincere desire of the group that’s behind this lawsuit to keep public lands in public hands. That’s what this is about. This is about keeping public lands in public hands, where it belongs.”

The lawsuit claims the project by its very nature violates the deed restrictions on the property.

Poliakoff argued that’s not the case at all.

“Contrary to their statements, there are no deed restrictions on this site,” he said. “The Florida Supreme Court has firmly established that restrictive covenants affecting the usage of land do not apply to a public body which acquires the land. Even if they did apply, the Florida statutes fully support that workforce housing is a public purpose.”

An amendment to the state’s Live Local Act, expected to take effect Wednesday, will allow developers to build workforce housing on government land in a bid to address the state’s affordable housing crisis.

In May, Related Group revised the project to add workforce apartments under Florida’s Live Local Act. The move allows the developer to bypass local density and height restrictions. It also transfers full control to the city, forcing the county into an observer role with no say in the project.

The lawsuit lists several reasons why DiBono, the lone named plaintiff, will be personally impacted if the condo gets built.

DiBona purchased her home in reliance on the open, low-intensity character of the property, which has been owned by the city and used solely as a public park and community facility for more than four decades, the lawsuit says.

If built, the new condo tower will stand up to 365 feet in height, nearly double the height of DiBona’s building.

“Because the tower will rise above her building at close range, the occupants of its upper floors will have direct sightlines into the interior living spaces of her unit, depriving DiBona of the privacy she presently enjoys in her home,” the suit states.

“The tower will obstruct and ultimately eliminate DiBona’s direct view of the park, limit her view of the ocean, and will interfere with the light and air enjoyed by her unit in a manner not shared by the public at large,” the suit adds. “The project includes an elevated rooftop pool and cabana deck that will generate noise impacts, harming DiBona’s quiet use and enjoyment of her balcony and unit.”

Poliakoff argues DiBono has no standing in the case.

“Florida law is abundantly clear that to challenge a local zoning ordinance or development, a plaintiff must prove a ‘special injury’ that is different in kind, not just in degree, from what the general public experiences,” he said. “Living two blocks away from the development does not constitute a special injury.”

Article Link: Lawsuit aims to stop private condo from being built on public beachfront in Hollywood
Author: Susannah Bryan

Keith Poliakoff, Managing Partner, Government Law Group

June2026 — In an interview with Invest: Keith Poliakoff, managing partner of Government Law Group, discussed how AI is changing the front end of land use work, why cities are rethinking revenue and community benefits, and what it takes to move development forward in a more constrained policy environment. Poliakoff also shared how public-private partnerships can earn trust when outcomes are measurable. “What makes it succeed is really making sure that the public is getting a quantifiable, known benefit, one that can be felt, seen, touched, from the project that you’re proposing.”

What changes have you seen in your practice areas over the past year?

AI has made significant strides into land use, zoning, and entitlement, especially on the visualization side. A client can plug in a photograph of a property and generate a massing concept and design quickly enough to show elected officials what the proposed building could look like and what they are proposing.

I did not expect this level of capability to arrive in our space so quickly, but it is here and it is transforming how projects are communicated.. AI also demands careful attention to accuracy. For example, in one instance, there was a case where an online publication used an AI-generated rendering instead of the actual project, highlighting the importance of clear communication. On the positive side, municipalities are beginning to leverage AI themselves, integrating zoning information and massing concepts to illustrate parameters such as height, density, and allowable uses. This opens the door for more informed decision-making and faster, more transparent planning processes.

How do you see cities managing growth while preserving their character?

Every municipality must weigh redevelopment against community impact. Forward-thinking cities that are thinking long-term are focusing on smart development, particularly mixed-use projects that reduce reliance on vehicles. These projects can expand housing options, reposition underutilized land, and strengthen the tax base to support essential services.

Many of my current projects include mixed-use and mixed-income components, which are far more mainstream today than they were 20 years ago. In coastal and oceanfront areas, resiliency is also a major factor. Developers are actively designing with floodplain realities in mind and trying to ensure buildings will perform for decades. Consequently, the standards they’re building to today are often more conservative than those from just a few years ago to help guarantee sustained performance.

How are city policies impacting economic development?

Municipalities are closely monitoring state-level property tax discussions that could reshape how ad valorem revenue is collected. As a result, many cities are exploring creative ways to fund essential services should those revenues be reduced or eliminated. This dynamic is also prompting local governments to scrutinize community benefits and long-term fiscal stability when evaluating new development. In practical terms, cities are placing greater emphasis on the broader value a project brings beyond private returns, including its contributions to infrastructure, public spaces, and overall quality of life. By doing so, they are positioning themselves to plan proactively for a landscape in which their tax base may fundamentally shift.

What lessons can developers and municipalities take from legal disputes or public pushback to build stronger agreements up front?

While development agreements and comprehensive deal structures are already common on larger projects, what has changed is that they are now standard practice, and both developers and municipalities now expect much more detail and clarity upfront.

When a developer proposes a use that goes beyond what the site previously supported, municipalities tend to seek clearer commitments and protections. From a developer’s perspective, the best approach is to anticipate the complications or potential problems and address them early. Clearly defining public improvements, their timing, and each party’s obligations helps prevent misunderstandings and builds confidence among community members. Ultimately, when a development agreement is crafted with the community’s best interests in mind and clearly outlines its benefits, it often earns strong support from neighbors who recognize the value the project will bring to their quality of life.

What makes a city developer-friendly in today’s environment?

Some cities stand out by demonstrating that they welcome investment and are well-prepared to support it. The most developer-friendly communities typically offer concierge-style processes, clear points of contact, and staff who help projects move forward efficiently.
Developers frequently share their experiences with one another regarding where they want to build and where they won’t. Often, the difference comes down to whether the city acts as a true partner in execution. Municipalities can safeguard community interests while keeping processes organized and predictable, which ultimately encourages developers to invest locally.

What does it take to make a public-private partnership truly work for both sides?

I’ve probably negotiated more public-private partnerships than anyone in the state of Florida at this point. What makes them succeed is ensuring that the public is getting a quantifiable, known benefit, one that can be felt and seen, from the project that you’re proposing.

When the benefit is clear and the end product is something the governmental entity can be proud of, you often see the tone shift after delivery. If a community sees a real outcome, the municipality becomes more open to future P3 opportunities. One example is work done with cities like Hollywood, where an older, deteriorated housing site was redeveloped into senior affordable housing. When the public outcome is tangible, the model becomes easier to repeat.

What trends are you watching that could shape development in the coming years?

One major trend is the continued shift of home rule authority. The Florida Legislature has been increasingly active in defining what municipalities and counties can approve or deny, which alters the playing field for land use and development. Developers and land use attorneys are closely monitoring these changes because they impact timelines, standards, and local discretion.

Another trend is the current economic reality. While interest rates have eased somewhat, developers are still struggling to make the numbers work on many deals. Construction costs have improved since their peak levels, especially on materials like concrete and steel, but they are not back to pre-COVID pricing. The result is a slower build cycle. Projects are still moving forward, but not at the magnitude we’ve seen in recent years.

Housing demand remains strong, particularly in South Florida, where population growth continues to strain available supply. Many households cannot afford to buy, and rents can be unaffordable, even for people with steady employment. That affordability gap is ultimately shaping what projects can get financed and what communities are willing to support.

From a firm perspective, what are your priorities for the next three to five years?

We expect that as rates continue to settle, we’ll see more refinancing activity and more projects moving from entitlement into construction. Another major trend will be re-entitlement. A property might initially be entitled at maximum density and height, but when it’s time to build, the developer may need to adjust the plan in order to make sure the deal pencils out. That could mean a different density, parking, or unit mix. So the “packaged” entitlement strategy today may look different when projects actually break ground.

Lenders are more focused than ever on risk and documentation, and we are seeing increased demand for zoning and land use opinion letters. We are also seeing an increase in related confirmations that projects are properly entitled and ready for financing. As capital becomes more active again, that diligence work will likely increase.

Is there anything else you wanted to add?

Office development is returning in a different form. Many of the projects that are taking shape today are not traditional office buildings. These office developments are Class A spaces with amenities that reflect how companies attract talent, including fitness and wellness components, lifestyle features, and a more hospitality-oriented experience. That kind of product is aimed at the expectations of a new generation of workers and companies relocating from other major markets.

At the same time, older office inventory that no longer fits post-COVID demand is still being repositioned. We continue to see conversions where it makes sense, including redevelopment strategies tied to Live Local incentives. Tourism is also gaining momentum. Hotel owners who were cautious for a period are starting to re-engage, looking at refurbishments and new opportunities connected to cruise activity and broader demand.

Overall, the outlook is bullish compared to where it was a couple of years ago. While the capital stack is still sensitive to rates and costs, the interest in South Florida remains strong, and that keeps the development conversation moving.

Hollywood, Florida invokes Live Local 4.0 to battle Broward County

Hollywood moved to override a prior county rejection, teeing up an August vote on a 210-unit plan with workforce housing.

Live Local 4.0 is enabling Hollywood to advance redevelopment of a city-owned beachfront site despite a prior county rejection. Broward commissioners will decide between a 111-unit condo project or a 210-unit plan that adds 84 workforce units for renters at 120% of AMI.

Florida’s Live Local 4.0 isn’t law yet, but it passed the Legislature with near-unanimous margins. One Florida municipality, Hollywood, isn’t waiting for Gov. Ron DeSantis’s signature.

Next month, Broward County commissioners may decide how many units Related Group can build on a city-owned beachfront site. If they do, they will also determine whether the project includes workforce housing alongside owner-occupied condos.

That vote would reverse a February rejection. After Live Local 4.0 cleared the legislature in March, Hollywood invoked the bill’s forthcoming authority over government-owned land to revive the project. With the move, the city is effectively using state law to override the county’s decision.

It’s an irony embedded in Live Local’s three-year fight. The authority cities and counties battled to block is now the tool a city is using against the very county it inhabits.

Rather than no new housing, Broward commissioners will likely have to decide between a medium-rise with 111 condo units and no workforce housing, and a 210-unit high-rise that includes workforce housing. Approving the high-rise would make Hollywood the first city in the state to develop municipal land under Live Local.

DeSantis pushed for building more workforce housing across the state when he proposed Live Local in 2023. He may simply allow the latest revision to take effect July 1 without his signature, a common occurrence for laws that pass by wide margins.

“We’re waiting to see what happens,” Broward County Mayor Beam Furr, told The Builder’s Daily.

A four-year battle

In 2022, Related Group, known for condo development throughout Florida, struck a 99-year land lease with Hollywood for 1301 South Ocean Dr. and proposed the 111-unit condo. The city determined that it would generate $2.7 billion over that time, providing needed revenue to address aging infrastructure across the city.

Land-use plans dating to 1977 designated the site for medium density, where a community center now stands. Subsequent plans maintained that designation.

A handful of neighbors in the condo towers next door opposed the project, along with residents seeking to protect the beach, even though the building will rise amid existing development. Subsequently, Broward officials decided the land-use plans were in error and that only a community use was allowed.

After Live Local passed, Related Group revised its plan to meet the law’s conditions. The developer increased density, adding 84 workforce units priced for renters earning 120% of area median income.

Hollywood’s city commission approved the revised plan May 20 on a 5-2 vote, despite roughly 30 residents voicing their continued opposition. The Broward commission pushed its hearing on the plan to its August meeting, hoping for a DeSantis veto.

Keith Poliakoff, Related Group’s attorney, told The Builder’s Daily the county has an important decision to make.

“We’d be happy to build the 111 units,” Poliakoff said. “We’re going to be happy to build the 210 and give housing opportunities to those on the ocean who may not have had it before.”

Poliakoff noted that whatever the decision is, Live Local checkmated the opposition.

“They won a couple of battles along the way, but they’ve lost the war, and now they have to accept reality that this site will be redeveloped,” he said.

Article Link: Hollywood, Florida invokes Live Local 4.0 to battle Broward County
Author: Richard Lawson

Hollywood project isn’t a mistake — it’s an economic lifeline | Opinion

The Sun Sentinel Editorial Board’s recent clutching of pearls over the development at 1301 S. Ocean Drive (“Hollywood’s horrendous high-rise mistake,” editorial, May 27) ignores economic reality, architectural logistics and municipal survival. Far from a “horrendous mistake,” Hollywood’s handling of this project is a master class in adapting to bureaucratic whiplash and securing a future for its residents.

Let’s dispense with the hysteria and look at the facts. When this property was dedicated to the city in 1974, it was given “for whatever the Commission wishes.” Today, the location is completely built out and nearly 100% impervious, consisting of asphalt parking, almost no landscaping, and the converted former sales center for the neighboring Summit Condominium that towers over the site.

After numerous public meetings and exhaustive vetting, the City Commission unanimously agreed to partner with the Related Group. The goal was simple and environmentally beneficial: maximize this underutilized site to build a modest 111-unit condominium and a brand-new community center, while doubling the size of Harry Berry Park and increasing the site’s pervious area by more than 17,000 square feet.

The city acted in good faith in seeking to redevelop the site, relying on the residential designation on the 1977 county land-use map that has been continuously readopted ever since. Broward County explicitly confirmed this residential designation, allowing the developer to move forward, only to reverse its stance years later.

Faced with the potential loss of more than $2 billion in long-term economic benefits, in an era of sweeping property tax reform and major financial uncertainty, abandoning that revenue would have been an act of municipal malpractice. To fund vital services without burdening taxpayers, the Commission made the tough, correct call: They approved a project under the state’s Live Local Act.

This pivot allows for a 210-unit development that includes 84 workforce housing units. Furthermore, this green building has been designed with the latest resiliency standards to ensure that it will stand the test of time.

The Editorial Board and other local critics have weaponized the term “poor doors” to describe the layout of this building, displaying a stunning ignorance of basic architecture. The luxury condos in this tower feature private elevators that open directly into individual living rooms.

To solve this, a separate section of the building was thoughtfully designed for the workforce rentals. These residents aren’t being shoved into a dark alley; they are receiving their own dedicated access, amazing amenities and stunning ocean views. Who are these units for? Our police officers, firefighters, teachers, hospital workers and the service sector community. Giving the people who run our city a chance to actually live on the beach is the realization of founder Joseph Young’s dream, not a betrayal of it.

The opposition’s narrative that Hollywood is usurping home rule is entirely backward. The city is using the tools available to maintain its home rule. If critics truly despise the 365-foot, 210-unit Live Local project, their ire is pointed at the wrong dais.

The Broward County Planning Council and the County Commission have the opportunity to confirm the county’s map, which has existed for nearly 50 years. Confirming the initial position given respects Hollywood’s home rule, and would enable the development of the original, less-dense 111-unit design. Either way, Hollywood’s leadership ensured the city will not lose out on the economic opportunities it desperately needs. That isn’t a mistake; that is leadership.

Keith Poliakoff is a land-use attorney based in Fort Lauderdale who represents PRH 1301 South Ocean Dr., LLC, an affiliate of the Related Group.

Article Link: Hollywood project isn’t a mistake — it’s an economic lifeline | Opinion
Author: Keith Poliakoff

Broward County delays vote on controversial Live Local project in Hollywood

County commissioners delayed a vote on Hollywood’s controversial high-rise project Tuesday until they return from their summer break in August.

Commissioner Beam Furr, whose district includes Hollywood, said a county vote was likely moot now that Hollywood commissioners have approved a plan to use the state’s Live Local Act to move the project along.

An amendment to the state’s Live Local Act expected to take effect July 1 would allow developers to build workforce housing on government land.

Related Group plans to build a luxury condo tower with workforce housing apartments on city-owned land at 1301 S. Ocean Drive.

An earlier plan called for 111 luxury condo residences. But under Live Local, the developer plans to build 126 condos and 86 rental apartments.

On Tuesday, Furr requested an environmental review of the site since it’s located in a priority planning area for sea-level rise.

Commissioner Steve Geller suggested Furr touch base with the developer to see whether the original plan for 111 condos might still be on the table.

Sticking with the original plan is still a bad idea, according to Cat Uden, a Hollywood activist who has helped lead the charge against the project.

“It’s going to set a dangerous precedent,” Uden said after the meeting. “The land was not meant for private residential. The land was meant for the community. They do not need to build on public land.”

Keith Poliakoff, attorney for the developer, had a different take.

“The county realizes it has 100% lost the ability to control this project and is trying to work out a deal,” he said.

Susannah Bryan can be reached at sbryan@sunsentinel.com. Follow me on X @Susannah_Bryan

Article Link: Broward County delays vote on controversial Live Local project in Hollywood
Author: SUSANNAH BRYAN

Hollywood agrees to Live Local plan for high-rise tower on public land

Amid a loud and furious public outcry, a luxury condo tower slated for public land on Hollywood beach would become a Live Local project under a controversial plan approved by the commission Wednesday night.

The 5-2 vote came after a marathon meeting where nearly 30 residents blasted the idea, saying it would forever change a cherished slice of paradise frequented by locals and tourists for decades.

Several speakers questioned the city’s projected windfall on the project, saying they suspected the numbers were inflated.

“This is a horrible contract,” resident Dan Lacey told the commission. “The city of Hollywood becomes a landlord for 100 years. And we are on the hook to collect rents. We’re on the hook for 100 years. This is not the goose that’s laying the golden egg. This is a terrible deal.”

Mayor Josh Levy and the rest of the commission defended the plan, saying it would help bolster the city’s supply of affordable housing.

Commissioners Caryl Shuham and Idelma Quintana cast the two “no” votes after the developer declined to avoid using “poor doors” that would force renters to use a separate entrance from condo owners.

The developer, Miami-based Related Group, plans to build the high-rise tower on city-owned land at 1301 South Ocean Drive. The parcel, deeded to Hollywood more than 50 years ago, is now home to Harry Berry Park and the Hollywood Beach Culture & Community Center.

An amendment to the state’s Live Local Act expected to take effect July 1 would allow developers to build workforce housing on government land in a bid to tackle the state’s supply of affordable housing crisis.

As of late 2025, the plan called for a 27-tower with 111 luxury condo units.

With the potential switch to Live Local, the developer plans to build a taller tower with 210 residences. Of those, 126 would be condos and 84 would be apartments reserved for workforce housing for 30 years.

Over the entire lease, the city would collect an estimated $2.7 billion in payments, according to city projections shared with the commission on Wednesday night.

Shuham skewered the projection, calling it fantastical.

In December, the commission was told the project would bring in $1.8 billion over the 99-year lease, Shuham noted.

“That has increased by $1 billion since December?” she said with a quizzical tone. “It’s impossible. This is not a good deal for the city of Hollywood. The dollars are unrealistic.”

Resident Michael Seltzer also questioned the numbers, including the assumption that the condo units would sell for $5 million apiece.

“I think we’re getting hoodwinked,” he told the commission. “What happens if those numbers are wrong? Those numbers are fabulous. But I have a feeling they might be slightly exaggerated.”

As part of the 99-year lease, the developer has promised to build a new park. A modern two-story community center costing up to $20 million also would rise on the site, but the city would foot the bill.

Before voting, Shuham insisted that the developer avoid using “disgraceful” poor doors.

Speaking to her colleagues on the dais, Shuham said “I don’t think any of you want to be known as the poor door landlord, implying that our heroes or our busboys aren’t fit to walk through the same lobby or swim in the same pool as the wealthier residents. No segregation, no separate amenities.”

But when Shuham asked the developer’s attorney if his client would agree to a single entrance for all residents, the answer was a resounding no.

“I’m not agreeing to that,” Keith Poliakoff, attorney for the developer, said before walking back to his seat.

Commissioner Kevin Biederman joined Shuham and Quintana in taking a stance against separate entrances.

“I’m against the poor door entrance,” he said. “I think it should be one entrance. Let’s get this built. Let’s get a community center built.”

Commissioner Peter Hernandez, frustrated by the chorus of critics, suggested that money for the new community center be spent in another part of town where the residents would be grateful.

“I want the $20 million for somewhere else,” he said, looking out at the audience. “You guys don’t want the development anyway.”

Hernandez urged the commission not to “zero out” his idea.

“There is a need in different communities where they will be grateful and very appreciative,” Hernandez said.

The mayor said staff could look into the possibility.

“The developer might be eager to get a larger footprint on the project,” Levy said.

Before the vote, several residents pleaded with the commission to let the voters decide whether to move forward. Many of them reminded the board they’ve been fighting the project since 2021.

“I’ve been here five years doing the same damn thing,” said resident Mark Ross. “No, no, no. It’s not your land to give away.”

Hollywood commissioners signed off on the comprehensive agreement and ground lease four years ago.

Shuham argued that a new comprehensive agreement needed to be drawn up and voted on due to all the changes to the deal.

She pointed to the increase in density, the addition of rental units and the reliance on the Live Local Act.

Shuham also argued the plan should go to a vote of the residents.

“We have time to get it on the ballot for November,” she said.

Her request was met with silence.

Article Link: Hollywood agrees to Live Local plan for high-rise tower on public land
Author: SUSANNAH BRYAN

Gearing up for the future: Hollywood paving way for 25,100 apartments on Federal Highway

Hollywood could one day have a big city skyline with dozens of new high-rise residential towers — and city leaders want to do their part to make it happen.

Come Wednesday, commissioners are expected to sign off on a plan that would make way in the coming years for up to 25,100 mid-rise and high-rise residences along Federal Highway, from Sheridan Street all the way south to Pembroke Road. The current cap on dwelling units in the city’s high-density zone, known as the Regional Activity Center, is 17,100. The plan is to increase that by 8,000.

A second proposal would allow for up to 9,688 dwelling units along State Road 7. The current cap on dwelling units in Hollywood’s transit-oriented corridor along State Road 7 is 5,309. The plan is to increase that by 4,379.

The news might not go over well with residents, despite the urgent need for affordable housing.

Hollywood’s vision for both Federal Highway and State Road 7 calls for a vibrant, mixed-use urban core that preserves surrounding neighborhoods while also promoting pedestrian-oriented development, public-transit use, mixed-use buildings and aesthetically cohesive communities.

So far, nearly 6,000 residential units have been built or are in the pipeline along Federal Highway, said Hollywood spokeswoman Joann Hussey. Another 1,000 or so have been built or are planned along State Road 7.

By increasing the allowed density in both corridors, Hollywood is responding to evolving market conditions and ensuring continued residential growth within the city’s urban core, Hussey said.

“These types of updates are needed in mature cities as the economy and growth pattern shifts and the cities grow,” she said.

Far north of Young Circle, a 13-story apartment tower is on the rise at 2100 N. Federal Highway, just a few blocks south of Sheridan Street.

The project, dubbed 21 Hollywood, calls for 200 apartments along with 10,000 square feet of retail on the ground floor. The apartments should be ready to rent next year.

The building is the tallest on the block — for now.

“It looks huge because there’s nothing else around it,” said Dick Blattner, a former Hollywood commissioner who serves on the city’s Planning & Development Board. “But this new amendment will enable more projects like that to be built going from Sheridan to Pembroke Road.”

If the city’s visionaries are right, more towers like this one will be built along Federal Highway in the coming years.

While several taller towers have gone up around Young Circle, the city’s land-use map anticipates development will be focused up and down Federal from Sheridan Street all the way to Pembroke Road.

Over on State Road 7, an apartment building named Pinnacle 441 opened at the Johnson Street intersection, a few miles south of the Seminole Hard Rock Hotel & Casino.

Phase 1 of the eight-story project called for 113 apartments with rents as low as $1,100, built for residents earning 60% or less of the area median income. Phase 2 called for 100 more apartments.

When the first building was ready to open, more than 21,000 people registered to live in one of the 113 apartments. The developer resorted to a lottery systemto decide who would get the keys.

Keith Poliakoff, a land-use attorney who represents developers seeking government permits, predicts most of the new towers will be built in the next 20 years.

“These units are not all being built tomorrow,” Poliakoff said. “This is a long-term plan.”

He dismissed the objection frequently voiced by critics worried about traffic congestion.

“My car’s going to fly by the time those units are completed,” Poliakoff said. “When these units are built, everyone’s going to be getting in a vehicle and it’s all going to be automated.”

Whether that’s true or not, the city has to prepare for more people moving in, he said.

“When Pinnacle 441 opened, it had over 21,000 residents seeking to rent 113 units,” he said. “That showed the incredible need for housing that has not slowed down. Broward County estimates 7,000 new units are needed annually just to keep up with demand.”

Poliakoff praised the city for trying to get ahead of the game and signing off on additional housing for key corridors.

“Hollywood is really just getting ahead of the curve,” he said.

Longtime residents like Ann Ralston may be worried that dozens of new apartment towers will get built.

Guys like Blattner, the former commissioner who now sits on the planning board, are worried they won’t.

“The way the economy is right now, some of these projects are not going to be built right now if ever,” he said. “We’ve already seen projects put on hold. We have approved a lot of buildings in the past five years and they’ve never gotten built.”

Blattner said only one developer has requested an extension on their building permit.

“And that’s when the economy was better than it is now,” he said.

Article Link: Hollywood agrees to Live Local plan for high-rise tower on public land
Author: SUSANNAH BRYAN