Florida’s Live Local turns tables in Hollywood’s 30-story tower fight

Commissioners voted 6-1 after 12 hours of public input, the county’s next step hinges on a resident lawsuit.

Hollywood voted 6-1 to approve a 99-year lease and related agreements for a 30-story tower with workforce units under Live Local. Broward County’s options now depend on a judge as residents challenge deed restrictions and bankruptcy issues complicate the case.

Hollywood voted 6-1 to approve a 99-year lease and related agreements for a 30-story tower with workforce units under Live Local. Broward County’s options now depend on a judge as residents challenge deed restrictions and bankruptcy issues complicate the case.

The city of Hollywood, Florida, effectively told its home county of Broward to get lost, using newly acquired powers to approve a 30-story beach tower with workforce housing. The county’s next move depends on a judge.

City commissioners voted 6-1 in the wee hours last Thursday, after 12 hours of public input, to approve agreements letting Related Group build Portofino Hollywood. The developer has a 99-year lease on city-owned land at 1301 S. Ocean Dr.

Commissioner Caryl Shuham cast the lone no vote. She has opposed the project throughout, including its use of the community center site, and objected to plans that could give workforce tenants separate entrances and amenities from condo owners.

The vote capped a six-year siege in which environmentalists and owners in a neighboring 1970s condo tower battled to scuttle the plan. The county rejected the project in February, ruling the site was designated only for community use.

Florida’s freshly minted Live Local 4.0 legislation introduced an ironic situation for cities. The law pre-empts local authority over zoning, density and height on private development and creates incentives for workforce housing. But this year, lawmakers gave cities home-rule power over what they can do with government-owned property.

“You’re in a situation where most municipalities frown upon the application of Live Local because of their belief that Live Local took away their ability to govern their own jurisdiction,” Keith Poliakoff, Related’s attorney, told HousingWire TBD. “Then in the end Hollywood used Live Local to retain its home rule.”

Six years in the making

Related struck a ground lease deal in 2022, two years after it submitted an unsolicited proposal for the site. The developer proposed 111 condo units, and Broward County officials rejected them.

Hollywood’s mayor then pivoted to a Live Local project. Related added height and 84 workforce units, priced for renters earning 120% of area median income, to meet the law’s conditions. City commissioners approved the plan in May.

County officials refused to budge, and Live Local 4.0 was moving through the state Legislature. When it passed, Hollywood invoked the law’s authority to revive the plan. Related is also building a new community center as part of the deal.

Broward Commissioner Beam Furr, whose district includes the site, wouldn’t concede. He hoped DeSantis would veto the bill. The governor didn’t.

Furr still didn’t concede. At an August meeting, he asked colleagues to indefinitely defer a public hearing on Hollywood’s rezoning request.

The delay leaves the county in a position to resurface the question if a resident lawsuit succeeds and voids the city’s approval. Shuham will take the reins on the opposition since she’s due to replace term-limited Furr on the county commission.

Residents sued in June, arguing that the lease violates a deed restriction requiring the 4-acre site to stay in public use.

But that lawsuit is now in peril. The lead plaintiff, who lives in the neighboring condo tower, filed for bankruptcy and faces foreclosure over about $55,000 in unpaid assessments and legal fees.

“As a result of the bankruptcy, it sort of stays the litigation unintentionally,” Poliakoff said. “There are some issues that the court needs to decide before it can even look at the matter. It’s crazy.”

He said the plaintiffs’ chances are slim anyway.

“The courts in Florida generally side with the municipality because they believe that the municipality has the right to interpret and to govern itself,” Poliakoff added. “It will get thrown out, and they will lose. But they did it as a mechanism to try to delay the eventual development.”

Article Link: Florida’s Live Local turns tables in Hollywood’s 30-story tower fight
Author: Richard Lawson

Causeway Cove project fight escalates: Can Fort Pierce push back against state law?

FORT PIERCE, Fla (CBS12) — A proposed luxury waterfront development in Fort Pierce is drawing renewed attention after city commissioners approved a motion to explore hiring outside legal counsel to review whether the city has any options to challenge the project under Florida’s Live Local Act.

The Sept. 14 vote comes as cities across Florida continue testing the limits of the state’s Live Local Act and lawmakers implement the latest round of changes to the law.

The proposed Causeway Cove development on South Hutchinson Island has become one of the Treasure Coast’s most closely watched growth disputes, putting residents and local officials at odds with a state law that limits how much control cities have over certain housing projects.

At its Sept. 14 meeting, the commission approved a motion to explore hiring an outside land-use attorney to determine whether Fort Pierce has any legal grounds to challenge the project under the Live Local Act. The city is also monitoring lawsuits filed elsewhere in Florida that seek to restore greater local control over development decisions.

The move comes as Florida enters the latest phase of the law. Known as Live Local 4.0, the most recent changes took effect July 1, 2026, expanding eligible development sites and further clarifying protections for qualifying projects that include affordable housing.

Qualifying developments must continue to reserve at least 40% of units as affordable rental housing for at least 30 years.

Now, Fort Pierce finds itself at the center of a broader statewide debate over growth, affordable housing and home rule.

The proposed redevelopment would dramatically transform the Causeway Cove property along Seaway Drive. According to city records, plans call for five towers ranging from 11 to 17 stories, 913 residential units, two hotels totaling 407 rooms, more than 72,000 square feet of retail and commercial space, and 218 marina slips.

For residents like Edie Harrison, the project would change the area known for its waterfront views, boating access and small-town character.

“Everything is still very quaint,” Harrison said. “It’s one of those gems.”

Harrison and hundreds of other residents have raised concerns about the size of the development, traffic impacts and what they view as a lack of public input.

At the center of the fight is Florida’s Live Local Act, a law passed in 2023 to encourage the construction of affordable and workforce housing across the state. The law allows qualifying projects to bypass certain local zoning, density and height restrictions if affordability requirements are met.

City officials have repeatedly said the proposed Causeway Cove project qualifies under the law and therefore moves through an administrative review process rather than a traditional public hearing and commission vote.

For critics, that process has become one of the most controversial aspects of the proposal.

Fort Pierce Commissioner Michael Broderick said residents’ concerns extend beyond the size of the development.

“The concern is density, traffic flow,” Broderick said, pointing to longstanding concerns about capacity on Seaway Drive.

Another major debate centers on affordability.

Under Live Local, affordable housing calculations are based on regional income levels rather than income levels specific to Fort Pierce. Critics argue the formula can produce rents that technically qualify as affordable under state guidelines but remain difficult for many local residents to afford.

According to city officials, some qualifying units could rent for more than $2,300 per month, while Fort Pierce’s median rent is substantially lower.

Broderick said many residents question whether those figures reflect true affordability within the city.

Even some lawmakers who supported the legislation have raised concerns about how it is being applied.

A month ago, State Rep. Dana Trabulsy, whose district includes parts of the Treasure Coast, has recently questioned whether developments of this scale reflect what legislators intended when they approved the measure.

The Fort Pierce dispute is also part of a much larger battle unfolding across Florida.

Several lawsuits challenging aspects of the Live Local Act are moving through the courts as cities seek to regain greater authority over local development decisions. Supporters of the law argue it is helping address Florida’s housing shortage, while critics contend it has weakened local home-rule powers and limited communities’ ability to shape growth.

Land-use attorney Keith Poliakoff, who has represented clients in Live Local disputes across the state, said local governments generally have limited discretion once a project satisfies state requirements.

Poliakoff said the law effectively requires municipalities to administratively approve qualifying projects, even when residents or local leaders oppose the density, height or scale of a development.

State data show more than 200 Live Local projects have been proposed or approved across Florida, making the law one of the most significant growth and housing measures enacted in recent years.

If things move forward as anticipated, construction on the Causeway Cove development could begin before the end of the year.

The property’s owner, Palm Beach developer Ashton DePeyster, did not respond to requests for comment.

Article Link: Causeway Cove project fight escalates: Can Fort Pierce push back against state law?
Author: Luli Ortiz

How The Fed’s Rate Hike May Affect Real Estate

Real estate practitioners mostly downplayed the immediate impact that Wednesday’s widely anticipated interest rate hike by the Federal Reserve will likely have on the industry, but they also noted the significant challenges that reinforced expectations for a “higher-for-longer” rate environment portends for financing and project advancement.

In its Sept. 15-16 meeting, the Fed’s Open Market Committee voted 12-0 to raise the target range for the federal funds rate for the first time since 2023, increasing it by 0.25% to the 3.75% to 4% range. The vast majority of committee members also indicated leanings toward another rate increase before the end of 2026.

Addressing the press, Fed Chair Kevin Warsh said the decision was supported by the combination of recent data indicating a solid economy and labor market, and inflation being stuck around 3.4% — well above the Fed’s 2% target — as a result of geopolitical instability. He also emphasized the Fed’s commitment to pursuing price stability and full employment, despite calls for lower rates from President Donald Trump, who appointed him.

Lawyers and other real estate professionals who shared insights with Law360 Real Estate Authority agreed that the real estate industry, like the broader market, had already largely priced in higher interest rates and the potential rate increase, with several suggesting the Fed’s action could actually provide a degree of greater certainty about the direction rates are headed.

But while that may help ease some buyer-seller logjams, it does not remove the pressures that higher rates typically produce in real estate.

“The more significant consideration for the commercial real estate sector may be what comes next. Market participants will be watching closely for indications that today’s action will be followed by additional rate increases before year-end, which could have broader implications for financing decisions, transaction activity and investment strategies,” said Ferdinand Gallo, a real estate investment partner at Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLP.

Increased Clarity

More so than the amount of the rate hike, one of the immediate effects of the Fed’s action is that it reduces ambiguity about its willingness to increase rates and what direction it is heading. With many in the real estate industry having entered the year hoping to see rate relief, Wednesday’s action may deliver a reality check that could lead to some movement on the transactions front, several experts suggested.

“Buyers have been telling sellers for a while now that pricing needs to adjust to the cost of capital, and sellers have largely been reluctant to accept that,” Brett Forman, managing partner of Forman Capital, said. “A rate increase, even a small one, removes some of the ambiguity and makes it harder for sellers to wait out the market.”

Josh Rubin, a New York-based real estate agent with Douglas Elliman, said this can work both ways, as buyers and sellers have been adjusting for several years now to higher borrowing costs.

“If anything, greater clarity about the direction of rates may help people who have been sitting on the sidelines waiting finally [to] make decisions,” he said.

While higher rates pose challenges for financing, Naheem Harris, co-chair of the real estate financing practice at Akerman LLP, said he does not “think that means that we’re pencils down on closing transactions.”

“There is still significant capital looking to be deployed, and we continue to see lenders and borrowers find creative ways to transact, utilizing loan extensions, preferred equity, mezzanine capital and other financing structures,” he said. “If the Fed is signaling that meaningful rate relief is not right around the corner, I think we may see more market participants stop waiting for yesterday’s rates to return and start figuring out how to transact in the rate environment we actually have.”

Financing Pressures

But while the trajectory of interest rates may now be clearer, that will offer little solace to the many property owners approaching loan maturities.

“If rates move higher again, it puts more pressure on the ‘wall of maturities’ coming due industrywide,” Forman said. “Floating-rate loans in particular become harder to service as debt service coverage ratios tighten, and in some cases there isn’t enough cash flow from the asset to comfortably make payments.”

Troutman Pepper Locke partner Dan Valenti also noted that increased rates means less net operating income, which means a lower debt service coverage ratio, or DSCR, a primary metric used to underwrite the financial health of a property and loan risk.

“For deals in the pipeline where the lenders did not previously take into account the possibility of rate hikes, those loans risk being resized,” Valenti said. “For in-place loans, the pressure on the DSCR may push the DSCR down so low that cash management provisions would be triggered, giving the lender more control over how cash at the property is applied, and for some borrowers may mean that they don’t meet the DSCR hurdles required to be achieved in order to extend loans facing maturity.”

Andrew Hellinger, co-principal of Miami-based development and management firm Urban-X Group, noted that the most pressure may arise with deals that closed from 2021 through 2023, when capital was at historically low costs.

“As those come up for refinancing, the spread between cap rates and interest rates has gotten too thin for a lot of them, and that’s when the underwriting gets harder,” he said.

Morgan Lewis’ Gallo suggested there might be an uptick in demand for fixed-rate loans.

“More risk-averse investors also may take a closer look at the cost of interest-rate hedging and weigh that expense against the certainty of a higher fixed interest rate,” he said.

Danny Diaz Leyva, who leads the Florida real estate practice at Day Pitney, said borrowers who believe another increase is coming may also have incentive to refinance or lock in capital sooner rather than later.

“Developers, owners and investors who had been underwriting a gradual compression in rates now have to confront the possibility that borrowing costs remain even higher for longer,” he said, but added, “For well-capitalized investors, however, periods of dislocation can also create opportunity, particularly as refinancing pressure begins to separate fundamentally strong assets from those that were dependent on inexpensive leverage.”

Contrasting Sectors

The experts said they expect the impact of rate increases to vary across sectors.

Multifamily borrowers in markets that are still absorbing new supply may feel additional pressure, particularly where rent growth has not kept pace with rising debt service and refinancing costs, Akerman’s Harris said.

Meanwhile, Trevor Adler, a real estate partner at Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, said he anticipates a “divide” between office and industrial.

“Office enters this cycle already capitalized as a distressed asset, so higher rates will compound issues for many office properties, while industrial’s short lease rollovers and mark-to-market rent growth let owners re-underwrite into the higher rate,” he said.

The impact could also extend to one of the industry’s hottest segments.

“Even data centers, which have been the belle of the ball of late in commercial real estate, may be impacted by the rate increase, given how capital intensive the sector is,” Harris said.

On the housing front, the elevated rate environment will continue to weigh on affordability, transaction volume and housing starts in an undersupplied market, Noah Breakstone, CEO of development and land investment firm BTI Partners, predicted.

“Compounding these pressures, consumer confidence has fallen to its lowest levels in years, further dampening willingness to make major purchases such as homes,” he said. “Existing homeowners with locked-in lower rates remain relatively insulated, but prospective buyers and new construction activity face ongoing increased headwinds until longer-term yields stabilize or decline.”

Coupled with high construction and insurance costs, more expensive financing is only likely to place another hurdle in the way of development projects, Keith Poliakoff, a partner at Florida-based Government Law Group, said.

But Tyler Davis, president of Saunders Real Estate, said that while rising rates typically slow deal flow, if the rate increase helps with the Fed’s intended goal of bringing inflation under control, that could support the market’s long-term health.

“The full impact will ultimately depend on how the rate increase affects borrowing costs, inflation expectations, asset pricing and buyer sentiment in the months ahead,” he said.

–Editing by Emily Kokoll and Michael Watanabe.

Article Link: How The Fed’s Rate Hike May Affect Real Estate
Author: Nathan Hale

September 1, 2026, News and Notes

Amy L. Sergent has been admitted into the National Academy of Arbitrators which serves as the preeminent organization of labor and employment arbitrators in the U.S. and Canada.

Jon H. Gutmacher of Indian Harbour Beach has released the latest edition of his book Florida Firearms — Law, Use & Ownership.

W. Rogers Turner, Jr., of Orlando was honored with the 2026 David Hammond Professionalism Award from the Judge William Wieland American Inns of Court.

Keith Poliakoff of Government Law Group in Ft. Lauderdale wrote, “Hollywood project isn’t a mistake — it’s an economic lifeline” published by the South Florida Sun Sentinel.

Roy L. Weinfeld presented, “Fundamentals of Florida Association Lien Foreclosure Law,” via Zoom.

Christine M. Walker of Fowler White Burnett presented, “The AI Ethics Paradigm,” at the Southeastern Admiralty Law Institute’s Annual Seminar in Williamsburg, VA.

Meredith Frank Mendez of Malloy & Malloy was sworn in to the board of the South Palm Beach County Florida Association of Women Lawyers as director of events.

Samir Patel of Holland & Knight was appointed to the Florida Courts Technology Commission by Florida Supreme Court Chief Justice John D. Couriel.

Ken Pruitt of The P5 Group has been appointed to the Florida Housing Finance Corporation Board of Directors.

Judge Stefanie C. Moon of  Broward County served as an evaluator for the Southeastern Region Teen Oratorical Competition for Jack and Jill of America, Inc.

Alexander Ruiz of the Prestige and Pacifica Companies has been appointed to the Florida Housing Finance Corporation Board of Directors.

Justin Shapiro of Leefield & Partners in Miami presented, “Haphazard Hazards: Identifying Common Premises Defects and Code Violations,” during the American Association for Justice Annual Convention in Chicago.

David L. Luikart III of Hill Ward Henderson has been selected to participate in Leadership Tampa’s Class of 2027.

Ira Cohen delivered two presentations at the 2026 Annual Meeting of the International Trademark Association in London, England, on, “Accelerating IP Applications (Patents, Trademarks, and Copyrights),” and “Non-Traditional Marks.”

Gary A. Forster of ForsterBoughman presented, “Customizing Corporate and Personal Structures for Asset Protection and Tax Efficiency:  Comparing and Combining Domestic and International Trust, LLC, and Tax Strategies,” via LIVE National Webinar.

Robert Gordon of Kudman Trachten Aloe Posner is now president of the Palm Beach Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers.

Eric C. Boughman of ForsterBoughman presented, “Building a Healthcare Practice in Florida:  Choosing the Right Business Model and Launch Strategy,” via LIVE National Webinar. He also offered free legal advice and guidance to veterans at Seminole County Legal Aid’s Legal Clinic.

Kim Nutter of Brinkley Morgan in Ft. Lauderdale has been elected to the Association of Family and Conciliation Courts  Board of Directors.

Jason Goldman of Davis Goldman in Miami wrote, “The Promise and Pitfalls of Behavioral Health Urgent Care,” published by Healthcare Business Today.

Bill Kramer of Brinkley Morgan in Ft. Lauderdale has been named circuit court mediator by the Florida Supreme Court.

Alex Arteaga-Gomez of Grossman Yaffa Cohen has been elected to the Florida Justice Association Board of Directors.

Emily Pincow of LashGoldberg in Ft. Lauderdale wrote, “The Mentoring Moments We Lost and How Leaders Can Bring Them Back,” published by the Daily Business Review.

Anitra R. Clement of Shook, Hardy & Bacon won the National Bar Association Young Lawyer Division’s Trailblazer Award at the annual Junius W. Williams Awards Luncheon.

Manuel A. Garcia-Linares and Juan Delgado of Day Pitney in Miami co-wrote, “As South Florida’s Wealth Grows, So Do the Risks in Cross-Border Deals,” published by the Daily Business Review.

Alex Almazan of Almazan Law has begun a second term as chair of the American Heart Association’s Southeast Board of Directors.

Steven Gendreau of Henderson, Franklin, Starnes & Holt has been appointed to the Charlotte County Bar Association Board of Directors as Member-at-Large.

Article Link: September 1, 2026, News and Notes

Hollywood vote coming on 30-story Live Local tower slated for public land at beach

Despite strong local backlash, the controversial Portofino Hollywood project slated to rise on public beachfront land is edging toward final commission approval in October.

If all goes as planned, the 30-story tower would break ground by the end of 2027 and open in late 2029, says Keith Poliakoff, attorney for the developer.

Opponents are expected to come out in force on Sept. 8, when the high-rise project comes back to City Hall for a vote by Hollywood’s planning board on the site plan and design. A final vote by the City Commission is expected on Oct. 7.

Commissioner Kevin Biederman says he is looking forward to that final vote.

Biederman said he had no idea it would take years to see the project break ground. But he doesn’t attribute the long delay to what he called the persistent resistance.

Biederman argued the project will be good for the city’s bottom line.

Under the deal, Hollywood Portofino is conservatively estimated to yield anywhere from $1 billion to $1.8 billion to the city over the course of the 99-year ground lease.

If voters across the state approve the property tax break known as Amendment 3 in November, Hollywood might need a development like Portofino to help balance the budget, Biederman said.

“If the tax thing goes through, we are going to need the money that tower will get us,” he said. “1301 will produce multiple millions of dollars that will flow into our city and benefit the neighborhoods without having to burden the residents with a higher tax rate. Optimistically, 1301 could end up lowering our tax rate. It will benefit all of Hollywood.”

The $375 million project — a public-private partnership between Hollywood and Miami-based Related Group — is now moving forward as a Live Local project<https://www.sun-sentinel.com/2026/05/21/hollywood-agrees-to-live-local-plan-for-high-rise-tower-on-public-land/> with a 99-year ground lease approved by Hollywood commissioners more than four years ago.

The state’s Live Local Act now allows developers to build workforce housing on government land.

Related Group revised the project to add workforce apartments under the Live Local Act, a move that allows the developer to bypass certain land-use and regulatory hurdles. Hollywood commissioners approved that change in May.

Originally proposed as a 27-story tower with 111 luxury condo residences, the new plan calls for a 30-story tower with 84 workforce rental apartments and 126 condo residences priced at $4 million or more.

“The old project was much more of an in-your-face project,” Poliakoff told the South Florida Sun Sentinel. “The building wasn’t sideways. It was directly facing the water. This is a better project. Taller and skinnier.”

The tower would rise 375 feet high and sit steps from the ocean on taxpayer-owned land at 1301 S. Ocean Drive, now home to a community center and Harry Berry Park. The parcel was deeded to the city more than 50 years ago.

As part of the deal, Related Group has agreed to expand Harry Berry Park and replace the outdated community center with a modern two-story building.

Under state law, Live Local projects typically do not require commission approval. But in this case, a commission vote is required because Hollywood owns the land, Poliakoff said.

Commissioner Caryl Shuham has consistently voted against the project.

“I continue to strongly oppose the use of the community center site for a Live Local Act project — one that as of today might include separate entrances and amenities for those in the affordable units versus those in the multimillion-dollar condos,” Shuham told the Sun Sentinel. “That concept is a terrible fit for the city of Hollywood, especially when the city would serve as the property’s landlord.”

Shuham dismissed the notion that the project will save the city’s budget as a complete red herring.

“We do not need this project to generate a balanced and strong city budget,” she said. “And it is very dangerous to begin using city public recreational space to generate residential property tax revenue. If that’s the path Hollywood chooses, every single park in the city is now exposed to the risk of becoming a revenue generator. As a city, we owe it to our residents to maintain community and recreational space.”

A lawsuit was filed in June seeking to block the project and save the parcel from what some are calling a land giveaway. The city of Hollywood and Related Group are listed as defendants.

Poliakoff filed a motion last week seeking to dismiss the lawsuit.

Ryan Abrams, attorney for plaintiff Kathleen DiBona and the nonprofit group Keep Public Lands Public, has since refiled the complaint, removing the demand for injunctive relief. A hearing has been set for Sept. 22.

Hollywood has been working on the controversial deal since June 2020, when Related Group submitted an unsolicited proposal to develop the city-owned land.

Ever since, outspoken residents have been showing up at City Hall meetings to argue that private condo towers do not belong on public land.

A Facebook page called “NO private condo tower on Hollywood public page” now has 2,200 followers and posts regular updates to keep opponents informed.

One recent post urges opponents to show up at the upcoming planning board meeting to speak against the proposed high-rise tower.

Because the parcel is zoned “government use,” it’s exempt from any height cap, Hollywood officials say. Under that special zoning, any potential cap on height would be up to the discretion of the City Commission.

Critics have nonetheless argued that the proposed tower is too tall for the site and incompatible with the surrounding area.

Hollywood planning staff argue the opposite.

“With respect to surrounding character, the Staff identifies this portion of South Ocean Drive as an established high-rise oceanfront residential corridor,” staff wrote in a backup memo for the city’s planning board meeting on Sept. 8. “Staff identifies the Summit Condominium, north of the site, as 24 stories and more than 200 feet in height; the Stratford Towers immediately to the south as 10 stories; and the Oxford Towers and Trafalgar Towers farther south as approximately 16 stories.”

In the document, staff recommends the City Commission set the height cap for the new tower at 375 feet and 4 inches.

Members of the planning board will vote on a recommended height at their meeting in September. But the final decision will fall to the commission.

Article Link: Hollywood vote coming on 30-story Live Local tower slated for public land at beach
Author: Susannah Bryan

Transformation could be coming to landmark Hollywood hotel built in 1925

Hollywood Beach Resort, the century-old grande dame with a storied history, is now a vacant relic that appears to be heading toward a more cosmopolitan fate.

The landmark resort that was built in 1925 by city founder Joseph Young could very well be transformed into a 398-unit luxury condo tower standing 340 feet high or more.

Perched on a prime piece of beachfront land at 101 N. Ocean Drive, the hotel sits between the Broadwalk and State Road A1A at Hollywood Boulevard.

Local historians dream of seeing the property preserved and restored. But some worry that might be a pipe dream.

Vacant and fenced off after being declared unsafe in May 2023, the seven-story resort long known as the Grand Lady appears destined for redevelopment.

Related Group, partnering with BH Group and potentially Terra, has the 4-acre property under contract for $100 million.

“We recognize the community importance of addressing this vacant, deteriorating property,” Keith Poliakoff, attorney for the developer, told the South Florida Sun Sentinel. “Our team is actively engaged with acclaimed architects and city leaders to deliver a world-class redevelopment that realizes the full potential of this site. We look forward to formally unveiling our design concept in the coming months.”

In June, Hollywood commissioners approved a resolution confirming the owner has a vested right to build 398 residential units on the site.

At the same time, the city is poised to relax heights cap at the beach, potentially allowing towers as high as 340 feet where the Hollywood Beach Resort now sits.

Historic preservation incentives would give the developer another 150 feet, bringing the total height to 490 feet.

Hollywood commissioners are expected to vote on the beach height plan as soon as Aug. 26. A vote by the city’s Planning and Development Board will take place on Tuesday.

Local preservationists, who liken the hotel to The Breakers in Palm Beach and the Biltmore in Coral Gables, say it would be a shame to see the once glamorous hotel knocked down.

“If we lose our grand dame hotel, it would be a travesty of historic preservation justice,” said Clive Taylor, past president of the Hollywood Historical Society. “This thing was the tallest hotel in Broward County for years. There was no grand space. That was it. And it’s still standing there bookending the end of Hollywood Boulevard. It’s a historic skyline. It’s been there all this time.”

During its golden era, the resort played host to elite parties, high-society events and celebrity guests.

The property took on a new role as a naval training facility during World War II. It became a Bible college in the 1970s and later a condo-hotel and timeshare with an adjoining two-story mall.

“It means a lot to the residents,” Taylor said. “People had weddings there. They graduated from high school there. People remember it. The city should not lose it forever.”

Dan Kennedy, a longtime resident who lives seven blocks south of the hotel, sees things differently.

“Tear it down,” Kennedy told the Sun Sentinel. “It’s held together by the grace of God and termites. There’s still some morons who want it preserved. I say, ‘Build baby build.’ We need more investment on the beach. If they open these condos at the beach it will bring in better restaurants and shops and a better crowd.”

Some worry that the city’s plan to alter height caps on the coast will destroy the low-rise feel of the beach along with its quaint charm.

“It’s a shame that the Grand Lady was not kept up over the years and has been left to decay,” said Cat Uden, a longtime community activist. “What happens to this property could set the tone for future development on Hollywood Beach. If our Grand Lady can’t be saved, I would still like to see a beautiful hotel, not a 34- to 45-story condo tower.”

The clash between the folks who want to preserve the Hollywood Beach Resort and those who want change is not lost on city officials — including Commissioner Kevin Biederman.

“I think there are people who have a vision of the future – and people whose vision is clouded by the past,” Biederman said. “Are there people who have an emotional attachment to the fact that it was built by Joseph Young? Yes. Has it been neglected over the years? Probably. Should we try to preserve some aspect of the historical image? Yes.”

Developers with Related Group have been trying to purchase the property for at least a decade now.

“I think it’s finally in a place where you can get people to the table,” Biederman said. “The entire structure is going to be redesigned but we need to preserve some aspects of the historical design. I would love to see something done there. It is a prime price of real estate that’s one of the most visible spots on the beach in Hollywood.”

The Grand Lady was once the centerpiece of the beach and it could be again, Biederman said.

“I think that site was iconic in 1926,” he added. “And it has the ability to be iconic in 2036. The way development is nowadays, I would guess we’re at least six to eight years out from any completion of any redevelopment. Something needs to be done.”

The property is not on the National Register of Historic Places, yet still retains historic significance, said Dana Gallup, president of the Hollywood Historical Society

“It’s probably the single most notable historical structure that survives to this day,” Gallup said. “It’s the centerpiece of the beach. It’s the property you see as soon as you drive east over Hollywood Boulevard. If that property is returned to some semblance of its former glory, you’re going to see revitalization of retail and restaurants along the beach.”

If a new condo tower is part of the redevelopment, some are hoping it will be no taller than 12 stories, Gallup said.

“When the hotel opened it was considered the jewel of South Florida and Hollywood,” Gallup said. “It rivaled The Breakers and the Biltmore in terms of luxury. Beautiful, beautiful hotel.

“At the bare minimum, we’d like to see the front facade of the hotel preserved and the north and south sides.”

Gallup argues that as much of the hotel should be saved as possible.

“People look at it today and say it’s falling apart,” he said. “But things can be done to restore the visible parts of the hotel. The worst-case scenario would be a complete demolition and putting a 30-story tower in its place. Not only is the building historic, but it really tells the story of Hollywood.”

Article Link: Transformation could be coming to landmark Hollywood hotel built in 1925
Author: Susannah Bryan

1301 development team pushes back on resident criticism

The developer of the controversial Portofino Hollywood project, better known as 1301, is meeting with residents to address what it says is widespread misinformation about the project.

Why it matters: Related Group’s project has divided Hollywood, with many residents afraid the redevelopment of city-owned beachfront land will change the barrier island’s character and spur more high-rise development.

Catch up quick: After zoning issues and resident criticism stalled the luxury condo for nearly five years, the Hollywood City Commission approved making 1301 a Live Local project under a 99-year lease.

  • This change enables the developer to sidestep local zoning rules that could’ve put the project in jeopardy.
  • Originally proposed as a 27-story tower with 111 units, it is now planned to have 29 stories with 210 units — 84 workforce rental units and 126 luxury condos.

The latest: The project is now the subject of a lawsuit, alleging it violates a deed restriction on the site and requires voter approval.

Driving the news: Axios attended the first of two public meetings to learn more about the project.

  • Plans include a 20,000-square-foot-community center with an auditorium, multipurpose rooms and ballroom. There would also be 126 public parking spaces.
  • Harry Berry Park would be expanded and new bathrooms and a playground added.
  • Space for a coffee shop or convenience store is planned for the ground floor.

Friction point: Keith Poliakoff, attorney for Related Group, tells Axios that the biggest misconceptions are that the project would eliminate the park, dunes and community center.

  • He says the land can be used for any public use, pointing to the 1974 deed that states “for whatever the Commission wishes.”
  • Poliakoff says the public opposition prompted the developer to get 1301 approved through Live Local, which allowed the project to become larger.

The other side: In addition to the environmental concerns, critics have slammed the project for having separate entrances for the apartment and condo units, which some call “poor doors.”

  • “I don’t think any of you want to be known as the ‘poor door’ landlord, implying that our heroes or our busboys aren’t fit to walk through the same lobby or swim in the same pool as the wealthier residents,” Hollywood Commissioner Caryl Shuham said ahead of the May vote.
  • Poliakoff maintains that critics weaponized the term “poor doors” and don’t understand development of luxury condos.

What’s next: Poliakoff says the groundbreaking is expected in late 2027.

  • The next public meeting is 3 to 7pm on Aug. 6 at the Garfield Community Center, 300 Connecticut St.

Article Link: 1301 development team pushes back on resident criticism
Author: Naomi Feinstein

Boca Raton Museum of Art to Present $42.3 Million Mizner Park Arts Campus to CRA

The Boca Raton Museum of Art will present plans for a $42.3 million arts campus on 1.80 acres at Mizner Park’s north end when the city’s Community Redevelopment Agency meets July 27, on an agenda that also includes a downtown parking and license agreement review.

BOCA RATON, FL — The Boca Raton Museum of Art will present plans for a $42.3 million arts campus on 1.80 acres at the north end of Mizner Park when the city’s Community Redevelopment Agency meets Monday, according to a presentation posted with the meeting agenda.

The item is listed on the July 27 agenda as a presentation. The agenda carries no quasi-judicial hearings, no resolutions and no other business, so the agency’s five members are not scheduled to take formal action on the proposal. A transcript was not available for this report because the meeting has not yet been held.

The museum’s presentation, titled “Mizner Arts Campus” and dated for the July 27 meeting, describes three components on a 1.80-acre site outlined in an aerial photograph of Mizner Park’s north end. Those components are:

  • An art school the presentation calls a purpose-built home for art education, serving more than 5,000 students annually
  • A sculpture park the museum describes as public green space, free and open year-round
  • An auditorium for programs, performances and community use

The presentation puts the cost at $42.3 million, based on what it labels a feasibility study assessment, and says $20 million has already been secured. It does not identify the source of the remaining money, the ownership or lease status of the 1.80 acres, or any specific approval being requested from the agency.

The museum frames the project as completing the original master plan for Mizner Park’s north end, which the presentation describes as an art and culture hub. It notes the art museum opened in 2001 and the amphitheatre opened in 2002, while a planned concert hall was never built.

The museum traces its history to the founding of the Art Guild of Boca Raton in 1950, an art school and museum that opened on Palmetto Park Road in 1962, and the museum’s move to Mizner Park in 2001. It reports serving more than 50,000 visitors and more than 5,000 art students a year, holding 5,000 works in its collection, and running more than 10 exhibitions, more than 30 programs for all ages and more than 20 care and wellness programs annually.

Under a slide headed “The Moment,” the presentation says the art school is at capacity, that its current space cannot meet programmatic needs, and that the physical separation between the museum and the school limits collaboration and shared programming.

The museum projects the campus would more than double capacity for art engagement, to more than 10,000 students, and add K-12 programming it describes as free arts education for local schools. The presentation also cites outside research: Americans for the Arts for a finding that cultural tourists spend more than 60% more per trip than other travelers, the Urban Studies Journal for a finding that arts districts are associated with 8% to 15% increases in adjacent property values, and the Trust for Public Land for a finding of up to $4 in economic benefits for every $1 invested in public parks. Those figures appear in the museum’s own presentation and are not attributed to city staff analysis in the materials released with the agenda.

The presentation includes testimonials from participants who are not named. One, identified only as an art school student in 2026, is quoted saying, “My art class is the best thing in my week.”

Downtown parking review follows a June valet request
The agency’s second scheduled presentation is a downtown parking overview and a follow-up on a license agreement request, prepared by Special Projects Manager Stephen Timberlake and dated July 2026.

The item follows the agency’s June 9 meeting, which had no presentations, hearings or votes and ran about 25 minutes. According to the minutes, Neil Schiller provided a handout regarding a proposed valet parking permit in the downtown, and Deputy City Manager Andy Lukasik, City Attorney Joshua Koehler and City Manager Mark Sohaney provided additional information. At the same meeting, Fran Nachlas asked staff for an update on a pilot program for limited free parking downtown.

Staff’s recommendation is to continue granting renewals of existing license agreements while restricting new agreements to areas with low utilization, mainly west of Federal Highway. The presentation says staff is seeking the agency’s guidance on whether to keep offering additional license agreements for public parking spaces at all.

Over the last 12 months, the downtown metered system generated $2,002,366.45 across 530,894 transactions, according to the presentation. Meters accounted for 314,926 of those transactions and $1,284,046.95, at an average of two hours and two minutes purchased. ParkMobile accounted for 214,154 transactions and $716,712.50, at an average of one hour and 40 minutes. A special rate covering Mizner Amphitheater events and a 5-cent post office rate accounted for 1,814 transactions and $1,607.

Parking citations over the same period totaled 34,520, carrying $1,675,620 in fines. Expired meter citations made up 25,976 of those, with $909,160 in fines. The presentation lists 1,585 handicap violations at $396,250, 4,660 life safety citations at $289,745, and 2,299 other citations at $80,465.

Every on-street space inside the CRA boundary is metered, with a four-hour maximum and enforcement available 24 hours a day, according to the presentation. Payment is available at 118 meters or through the ParkMobile app.

The presentation lists eight active license agreements, all described as renewals:

  • Casa D’Angelo, three right of way valet spaces at 171 E. Palmetto Park Road, licensed since 2017, expiring 2027
  • Reno’s, three valet spaces on Southeast First Avenue, licensed 2018, expiring 2028
  • Via Mizner, three valet spaces on Boca Raton Road west of Federal Highway, licensed 2017, expiring 2026
  • 200 East Palmetto, three loading zone spaces on Royal Palm east of Mizner Boulevard, licensed 2012, expiring 2030
  • Hyatt Place, three loading zone spaces on East Royal Palm, licensed 2018, expiring 2028
  • D’Almeida Attorney’s Office, four spaces in the bank parking lot, licensed 2014, expiring 2029
  • Synovus Bank, four spaces in the bank lot, licensed 2013, expiring 2031
  • 280 E Palmetto Park LLC, two spaces in the bank lot, licensed 2025, expiring 2030

Three recent requests are pending, according to the presentation: a loading zone of two to three spaces for Tower 155 on Boca Raton Road, a valet stand on First Avenue using two to four spaces plus four more in the bank lot, and discussions with Mizner Park about additional spaces for premium valet.

The presentation also reports on two pilot programs. A 29-minute free parking rate launched in November 2024 on First Avenue, where about 8% of transactions used it. Boca Raton Road was added May 12, and about 15% of transactions there have applied the rate. About 3,000 free sessions have occurred to date, which the presentation describes as $3,000 in lost meter revenue.

Space occupancy monitors are running on Royal Palm and at Sanborn Square and were set to expand onto Palmetto in July. From January through June, the monitors logged 25,847 parking sessions of more than five minutes at Sanborn Square. About 10,000 lasted under 30 minutes, with about 25% tied to a paid transaction. Sessions of 30 minutes to an hour numbered 4,500, with 82% paid. Sessions of one to two hours totaled 6,800, with 83% paid. Sessions longer than two hours reached 4,500, with 75% paid.

The Sanborn Square area has 112 parking spaces, 68 on the street and 44 spread across two lots. Those spaces generate about $52,000 a year in meter revenue from more than 14,000 transactions, roughly 2.6% of the downtown total.

The agency meets at 1:30 p.m. Monday in the auditorium at 6500 N. Congress Ave. Residents who want to speak during public requests are asked to state their name and address for the record and limit remarks to three minutes. A City Council workshop meeting is scheduled to begin when the CRA meeting ends.

The board is made up of Chair Andy Thomson, Vice Chair Yvette Drucker, and Commissioners Michelle Grau, Jon Pearlman and Stacy Sipple.

The Community Redevelopment Agency continues to steer investment in and around downtown Boca Raton, balancing development interests against long-standing resident concerns. Our Boca Raton government section follows CRA actions and downtown projects.

Article Link: Boca Raton Museum of Art to Present $42.3 Million Mizner Park Arts Campus to CRA
Author: Mike Thomas

What you need to know about Florida today – Tuesday’s Afternoon Update

Florida Trend Exclusive
Legal Elite — Notable Managing Partners

Florida offers plenty of examples of elite leadership traits. Florida has the fastest-growing lawyer population, according to recent data from the American Bar Association. In the past decade, the number of active resident lawyers has grown by approximately 17%, ranking Florida fourth among states in lawyer population. The Florida Bar counts more than 115,000 members statewide. More from Florida Trend.

Florida business establishment remains quiet on property tax amendment

Less than four months before Floridians vote on a proposal to phase out property taxes for homeowners, there’s no organized campaign seeking to move the measure past the 60% vote required for passage. The biggest advocate for property tax relief, Gov. Ron DeSantis, said two weeks ago that he won’t lead any organized effort because the measure the Legislature approved in a special session in June “wasn’t my proposal.” Three groups, most recently a political committee called Floridians for Shared Prosperity, have formed to oppose Amendment 3. Cities and counties would lose $5 billion in tax revenue next year and $10.75 billion by 2031, according to state economists. More from the Florida Phoenix.

What is space jellyfish? Unique rocket launch contrails explained

The “space jellyfish” effect — illuminated rocket exhaust plumes that follow a launch around dawn or dusk — has developed a cult following online. The phenomenon is not dangerous; it occurs when a rocket lifts off in the hours around dawn or dusk and the exhaust plumes are illuminated by the sun just over the horizon. In rare cases, the contrail can transform into another shape — including a heart, as happened in March 2026 and July 2026 in Florida. More from Florida Today.

Florida Airport Seeks Airline Service After 17-Year Gap

Monroe County is seeking to restart commercial air service at Florida Keys Marathon Airport after a nearly 20-year gap, applying for a $1 million federal grant through the Department of Transportation’s Small Community Air Service Development Program. The money would make up part of a roughly $2.5 million minimum revenue guarantee for an airline that opts to start service. The county is looking to partner with United, Delta, or American, and has already begun discussions with American. More from Airline Geeks.

FIFA Fan Festival in Miami draws 600,000 attendees as World Cup shifts to final matches

The FIFA Miami Host Committee says the World Cup Fan Festival at Bayfront Park drew 600,000 attendees over 24 days. The 24-day event has wrapped, but the World Cup experience is continuing across South Florida. More from the South Florida Business Journal.

Article Link: Tuesday’s Afternoon Update – What you need to know about Florida today

What They’re Saying About Fla. Real Estate At 2026’s Midpoint

Florida has experienced its share of real estate boom and bust cycles over the years, but while the first half of 2026 fell short of the recent past, attorneys and other industry experts say the state appears poised to buck that pattern, and that more growth lies ahead.

Around the midpoint of the year, Law360 Real Estate Authority asked a cross section of real estate professionals, including attorneys, developers and brokers, to share their assessment of the year so far and where they see things headed, as well as what trends and issues they are watching, including in the courts and at various levels of government.

“We continue to monitor for any signs of distress, but the distress that many have been waiting years for has failed to materialize thus far except in unique instances more specific to an asset,” said Jordan Kornberg, chief investment officer at Mast Capital, a Miami-based real estate development and investment firm.

“People continue to talk about South Florida as the same ‘boom or bust’ market it had historically been. I don’t think people understand how the factors driving a lot of the demand across the market are different than they were in the past,” he added. “With a significant increase in companies relocating to Florida and more end users buying condos, the market has characteristics that are different and we think will lead to pockets of the market performing differently than they had in the past.”

Sizing Up the First Half

In many cases, “rebalancing” or “recalibrating” could be interpreted as euphemisms used to describe signs of a downturn in a market.

And as Tyler Davis, president at land brokerage Saunders Real Estate, acknowledged, “There have been several positives and some negatives in the Florida real estate economy in 2026 so far.”

Davis and BTI Partners CEO Noah Breakstone both said Florida’s real estate market has “remained resilient” in 2026 despite high interest rates, insurance pressures and oversupply in certain sectors, particularly multifamily residential.

“Demand remained resilient but more discerning,” Breakstone said. “Domestic migration slowed frorr post-COVID peaks — influenced by return-to-office trends and prior surges — but stayed positive, supporting inflows to Florida’s major metros.”

But context remains important in gauging Florida’s performance, several commenters noted, especially given the success the state just experienced.

“While the first half of 2026 reflects a period of stabilizing when comparing it to the frothiness of the first few years of spectacular growth in Florida post-COVID, it seems to me that the first half of 2026 still shows Florida, in particular South Florida and especially Miami and West Palm Beach, as extremely resilient, with major projects being developed by very-well capitalized developers,” said Eric Rapkin, real estate practice group chair at Akerman LLP.

“Overall, the Florida market is recalibrating. We are still defining what a normalized market might look like,” added Mark Levy, chief investment officer at FRP Development Corp., which has a portfolio of commercial, industrial and multifamily real estate. “We literally condensed so much growth into a three-year period that we forget markets don’t behave that way. It was tantamount to a war footing. Now, we have to digest and figure out what the right cadence is going forward.”

Danny Diaz Leyva, chair of the Florida real estate practice at Day Pitney LLP, also noted that commercial real estate, while generally strong in the first half, began at a slower pace than many anticipated. But he pointed out that the slower start was largely in comparison to significant momentum at the end of 2025, coupled with expectations from many investors that interest rates might decline, which has not materialized.

“The defining story of 2026 is not that the market has slowed — it is that the market has adapted,” he said. “Investors are no longer waiting for yesterday’s interest-rate environment to return. They are restructuring capital, adjusting underwriting, and continuing to transact within today’s realities. That adjustment is creating a healthier, more disciplined market for the long term.”

Several sources spoke about seeing considerable activity on the financing front, both for construction and recapitalization, and also about the considerable breadth of activity.

“In my 20-plus years of practice, I cannot recall a time period when I have seen so many construction financings occurring in the marketplace across so many different types of developments,” said Luis Flores, a partner at Saul Ewing LLP. “In most boom cycles, we see a concentration in one particular asset class, i.e., luxury condominiums, office buildings or rental apartments; however, the current development activity is not limited to a single asset class.”

Leyva said a focus on recapitalizations and equity infusions continued in the first half, with sponsors “bringing in new capital partners, restructuring existing capital stacks, and extending investment horizons rather than selling assets into a market where pricing has not yet fully recovered.” He said this has been particularly evident in the multifamily sector.

And while domestic migration has slowed from its pandemic-era surge, BTI’s Breakstone noted that it is still significant from traditional sources in the Midwest and Northeast, along with increased inflow from California and Texas. International capital was also a standout for South Florida luxury condos, he said.

“What has been somewhat surprising is the diversity of the buyer pool,” added Christine Martinez de Castro, chief marketing and sales officer for Miami-based development firm CMC Group.

Looking at different market segments, demand for single-family homes pulled back from its boom-era levels due to affordability issues, Breakstone and Saunders’ Davis said, with builders offering incentives such as rate buydowns, closing cost credits and price adjustments.

New residential construction permits statewide declined notably, Breakstone added, with about 24,800 in the first quarter, down more than 12% year over year after already slowing in 2025. “This reflected builder caution amid demand signals, costs and elevated interest rates,” he said.

Meanwhile, sources described multifamily rentals as a “mixed bag,” noting pressures from oversupply but also long-term confidence as supply is absorbed and the construction pipeline slows. South Florida, which Breakstone said ranked first nationally in multifamily construction activity, nevertheless remained strong in the sector. But other metro markets, including parts of Tampa, showed softening, according to Breakstone and Akerman’s Rapkin.

Keith Poliakoff, managing partner in the Fort Lauderdale office of Government Law Group PLLC said one of the biggest surprises has been the speed at which older condos, burdened by heightened state building safety and financial regulations, became difficult to finance.

“The condo market has split in two,” Poliakoff said. “Newer buildings continue to perform well, while many older condominiums are facing declining values because of insurance costs, reserve requirements, and limited financing options. Even modest interest rate relief hasn’t offset soaring insurance and ownership costs.”

On the other hand, luxury continued to be a strong point, particularly with wealth migration serving as a market driver, noted Ed Jahn, senior vice president of Kolter Urban, which is developing across multiple Florida submarkets. He added that consistent, if selective, demand has helped maintain development momentum in high-end downtown and coastal locations.

Retail had a good first half, buoyed by population growth, and industrial has also performed well, driven by logistics, e-commerce and business expansion, the experts said.

The South Florida office sector has also continued to outshine national numbers, with vacancy in Miami falling sharply to the low 12% range, one of the lowest rates among major U.S. markets, while featuring the highest average asking rents in the South, according to Asher Abadi, principal at Four West Developers, which is developing an office project in Hollywood, Florida.

“The nation believes office is in decline, but Miami told the opposite story,” Abadi said. “Corporate relocations and finance-sector growth, such as JPMorgan, Citadel, Amazon and Palantir, are pulling capital and headquarters out of higher-tax states faster than we can build space to hold them.”

Every asset class had sectors that performed well and those that continued to struggle, FRP’s Levy said.

“[With] industrial, it’s small bay, serving tenants under 10,000 square feet [that is doing well]. Office, it’s the top-tier Class A sector; hotels, it’s the luxury segment, as it is retail. Multifamily again skews luxury condos, but the middle market is squeezed given a shallowing middle class,” he said.

From the standpoint of different submarkets, Miami and West Palm Beach “continue to distinguish themselves,” Leyva said. “Both markets remain magnets for capital, talent and affluent migration, with investment continuing to flow from the Northeast, Latin America, and increasingly other international markets. Those demographic and capital trends continue to underpin demand across multiple asset classes and reinforce South Florida’s position as one of the country’s most attractive Iong-term real estate market.”

Several Gulf Coast markets also garnered mention for strong performances, including St. Petersburg, Naples and Sarasota, along with some growth corridors around Orlando, such as Lake Nona, and master-planned communities in the Jacksonville area.

Open-Eyed Optimism

The industry experts shared an overall positive outlook for the second half of 2026 and beyond, while acknowledging they will be keeping an eye on several headwinds.

Both Mast Capital’s Kornberg and Akerman’s Rapkin described themselves as “bullish” on the state’s prospects, and they were joined by a chorus of sources expressing their optimism.

“I think the second half of the year will continue to be strong. Miami continues to be showcased on the world stage, and more and more people are coming to Miami for the lifestyle and the business,” CMC Group’s Martinez de Castro said. “There are always some growing pains that come with growth and change, but I believe we are living through a remarkable period in Miami’s history. We are witnessing the city’s evolution into a true global destination and world-class city, and it is exciting to be a part of that transformation.”

Based on the number of financing term sheets his team has received recently, Saul Ewing’s Flores said he expects the current deal flow of Florida real estate projects to continue for the rest of the year and into the first quarter of 2027.

“Besides the financing activity, we have also seen an influx of requests to prepare fund and investment capitalization packages, which is the first step to further land acquisitions and future development,” he said. “As long as the demand for real estate products continues, both local and foreign investors and lenders will continue putting their dollars into Florida real estate.”

Four West’s Abadi said the South Florida office market presents a rare situation where there has been “historic-low construction, scarce prime supply and [corporate] relocation flows that show no sign of slowing.”

“When firm demand meets a market that physically can’t add inventory for years, rents hold, and well-positioned assets keep performing. We expect prime South Florida office rents to climb through year-end and into next year,” he said.

Tere Blanca, founder, chair and CEO of Blanca Commercial Real Estate, also said the outlook is strong for commercial leasing demand to continue the pace observed in the first half, with the potential for an uptick in new-to-market companies from New York and California.

On the residential front, Hugo Arza, Miami real estate practice group leader at Holland & Knight LLP, said conditions are improving for single-family home development, with sellers reconsidering their positions and not wanting to lose out on selling their land. Breakstone said single-family homes are on pace to post modest year-over-year gains, but construction will “stay cautious” as builders focus on clearing existing product from their pipelines.

“Given the long lead time for development approvals, permitting and construction, however, even projects that start back up now in the second half of 2026 will not be delivered until later 2027 or 2028,” Arza added.

Andy Ansin, CEO of Sunbeam Properties — which is developing the Miramar Cove, a $1 billion, 125-acre mixed-use project in Broward County — was one of several sources who highlighted what he called a “clear shift” toward mixed-use developments combining residential, office, retail, hospitality and entertainment in one place.

“People are looking for more convenience in their daily lives. They want to spend less time commuting and more time enjoying where they live, work and gather,” Ansin said.

Wellness amenities are in demand for both offices and luxury residential. “It is worth reinforcing just how important wellness has become in the luxury residential market,” CMC’s Martinez de Castro said. “Today, true luxury cannot exist without a meaningful wellness component.”

While money may be no object for a segment of the market, affordability is a major factor that experts said will influence the market’s direction.

“Florida’s demographics will change based on where people ultimately can afford to live,” FRP Development’s Levy said.

“Long term, I think South Florida will really skew towards serving a more affluent demographic. Tampa and Orlando will grow considerably as population shifts look for better value, and Jacksonville could emerge as a further growth beneficiary over time,” he added.

Interest rates, and in turn mortgage rates, will also play a big role.

“Further stabilization or rate declines would boost affordability, accelerate absorption/sales, support prices, and potentially encourage more measured new construction,” Breakstone said. “Persistent stickiness around plus-6% would prolong builders’ use of incentives, slower absorption for new product and cautious starts.”

“Optimism about future rate cuts is dwindling, and it will be interesting to see whether this puts merchant development of industrial and apartments into another holding period,” Saunders Real Estate’s Davis added.

Migration into the state is another factor the industry will be watching closely, several sources said. Sustained or increased numbers of businesses, employees and their families, as well as retirees coming to the state would tighten inventory and encourage construction starts, in turn supporting all real estate segments, Breakstone said.

Sources also expressed hope for economic and political certainty.

“Miami tends to perform better than most cities during periods of uncertainty because of its global appeal and continued demand. However, instability and uncertainty on the world stage will always have some impact on real estate sales,” Martinez de Castro said. “Maintaining confidence in the market remains important as we move through the second half of the year.”

And one factor that cannot be overlooked in Florida is the state’s hurricane season, which officially runs from June 1 through Nov. 30, Akerman’s Rapkin pointed out.

“It was exactly 100 years ago in September 1926 that a massive hurricane devastated the entire region, including Miami, Miami Beach, Hollywood, Fort Lauderdale and Palm Beach, and which was likely the inciting cause of the complete crash of the Florida real estate market, which had been booming in the first years of the 1920s — although of course there were economic factors at play as well,” Rapkin said.

At the Capitol and in the Courts

The hottest policy topic related to Florida real estate this year has been a push, led in large part by Gov. Ron DeSantis, to slash or even eliminate property taxes. The idea has generated controversy, as it would greatly reduce local governments’ revenues. But lawmakers in the Republican-controlled Legislature ultimately decided to put a proposed constitutional amendment before voters in November that would increase both the state’s homestead exemption and the cap on annual ‘assessment’ increases for other properties.

Ahead of the vote, the “Save Our Homes from Excessive Property Taxes” ballot question faces a legal challenge that alleges it is misleading.

Akerman’s Rapkin said he thinks passage is likely but noted the 60% approval threshold required for passage.

Two other familiar policy topics continued to stay top of mind.

Florida lawmakers have devoted significant time to incentivize the construction of more affordable and workforce housing through 2023’s Live Local Act and later amendments, and to reforming condominium safety and financial regulations in the wake of the deadly 2021 collapse of the Champlain Towers South condominium building.

Both issues remain important topics in 2026, although the Florida Legislature passed further amendments to expand and add teeth to the Live Local Act but did not act to address concerns about the financial burdens the new condo regulations have imposed on unit owners and associations.

“Florida’s new condo safety laws have made buildings safer but placed enormous financial pressure on many owners. At the same time, stricter Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac lending standards are making it difficult to finance units in older buildings,” Government Law Group’s Poliakoff said. “The Legislature needs to address affordability for condo owners, particularly through financing solutions that help fixed-income residents pay mandatory assessments to keep their building safe.”

The strains caused by new mandates for inspections and collecting financial reserves also have sparked legal battles over special assessments imposed on unit owners, Poliakoff said.

In House Bill 1389, which DeSantis signed into law, lawmakers made land owned by local governments, school districts and houses of worship eligible for redevelopment using the Live Local Act’s tax breaks. The law also streamlined administrative approvals and strengthened requirements for local governments to participate in those tax breaks, and it extended Florida Fair Housing Act protections to prohibit discrimination against projects on the basis of their using those benefits.

The latter could be of particular importance, as several lawyers mentioned they were watching challenges to the Live Local Act from local governments seeking control over land use matters, which are largely preempted for projects that fit within the law’s parameters.

“Live Local will continue to help developers obtain approvals for workforce housing as well as other projects due to the threat of implementing Live Local,” Sunbeam Properties’ Ansin said.

Holland & Knight’s Arza said he will be monitoring the impact of Senate Bill 1434, also known as the Infill Redevelopment Act. Somewhat similar to the Live Local Act, this new law preempts local zoning and land use regulations to authorize residential development on “environmentally impacted” land of 5 acres or more in Miami-Dade, Broward and Palm Beach counties, where extensive development has made available developable land scarce.

“How this new regulation plays out, particularly in the context of larger tracts such as golf courses, could be market moving,” Arza said.

In terms of federal policy, Saul Ewing’s Flores said Florida real estate could experience disruptions if Congress does not confirm later this year that the EB-5 investment visa program, which has been an important source of capital for developers, will be extended beyond its September 2027 expiration date. While a year remains until the program’s scheduled sunset, this September marks the deadline for certain guarantees for applicants.

Additionally, Ansin said there is hope that the 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act will result in an increase in affordable and workforce housing. “This is particularly important in South Florida, where we have strict environmental regulations and often long and expensive permitting processes,” he said.

The three biggest federal policies that can affect the second half of 2026 and next year are tariffs, immigration and interest rates, Blanca said.

“All three of these policies have impact on the cost of construction and overall dynamics across the real estate sector. Higher cost of goods, labor and capital may result in less new supply and less capital being invested across the industry,” she said.

Experts also offered their thoughts on additional issues that they said need to be addressed.

Saunders Real Estate’s Davis said he does not think enough attention has been paid to how much agricultural land in Florida has been converted for development this decade, saying his firm’s “Lay of the Land” report has estimated 177,000 usable acres of farmland have been lost since 2020.

“Growth is inevitable, but increasing density in cities and municipalities is critically important to slow down the urban sprawl,” he said.

He called for the Florida Legislature to increase funding for conservation efforts, including the conservation easement option, which allows owners to continue using land for farming while selling the state development rights.

Ansin raised the need for more high-quality private schools in South Florida.

“We continue to welcome families from the Northeast and across the country, but the number of available seats at top private schools hasn’t kept pace with that growth,” he said. “For many parents, finding the right school is just as important as finding the right home.”

Blanca also mentioned the need to address schools, but suggested the Legislature should look at improving quality K-12 public education along with mass transit and housing affordability.

“Those three pillars are essential to continue growth across Florida and may be successfully addressed in numerous ways, including facilitating the expansion of mass transit and development projects connected to mass transit, new laws that result in lower cost of housing and public-private partnerships for quality education programming,” she said.

Article Link: What They’re Saying About Fla. Real Estate At 2026’s Midpoint
Author: Nathan Hale